Literature DB >> 2215412

Dual-energy mammography: a detector analysis.

J M Boone1, G S Shaber, M Tecotzky.   

Abstract

Dual-energy mammography acquisition scenarios employing single-shot techniques are examined using computer simulation. A figure of merit of the signal-to-noise ratio squared over the glandular dose was chosen for the optimization task due to its exposure independence. Doses were evaluated using Monte Carlo techniques. The effects of kilovoltage, prepatient filtration, front detector thickness, mid-detector filtration thickness and composition were studied. Of the six detector pairs studied (Y2O2S/Gd2O2S, SrFBr/BaFBr, Y2O2S/LaOBr, Y2O2S/CaWO4, Y2O2S/YTaO4, and Y2O2S/LuTaO4), Y2O2S/Gd2O2S and SrFBr/BaFBr were found to be the best combinations. The effects of scatter and signal quantization were also examined. An alternative display technique whereby the tissue-subtracted (i.e., calcium) image is colorized and overlaid onto the conventional mammogram is introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2215412     DOI: 10.1118/1.596548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Improved dual-energy material discrimination for dual-source CT by means of additional spectral filtration.

Authors:  A N Primak; J C Ramirez Giraldo; X Liu; L Yu; C H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Priya Raghunathan; Mitali J More; J Anthony Seibert; Alexander Kwan; Joseph Y Lo; Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Laurie L Fajardo; Allen McGruder; Sandra M McGruder; Andrew D A Maidment; Martin J Yaffe; Aili Bloomquist; Gordon E Mawdsley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms--a signal-to-noise study.

Authors:  D S Breitenstein; C C Shaw
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Linear fitting of multi-threshold counting data with a pixel-array detector for spectral X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Ryan D Muir; Nicholas R Pogranichney; J Lewis Muir; Shane Z Sullivan; Kevin P Battaile; Anne M Mulichak; Scott J Toth; Lisa J Keefe; Garth J Simpson
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.616

7.  Spectral X-Ray Diffraction using a 6 Megapixel Photon Counting Array Detector.

Authors:  Ryan D Muir; Nicholas R Pogranichniy; J Lewis Muir; Shane Z Sullivan; Kevin P Battaile; Anne M Mulichak; Scott J Toth; Lisa J Keefe; Garth J Simpson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-12

8.  Dual-energy crystal-analyzer scheme for spectral tomography.

Authors:  Denis Zolotov; Alexey Buzmakov; Maxim Grigoriev; Igor Schelokov
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.304

9.  Development of a high-performance dual-energy chest imaging system: initial investigation of diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Hany Kashani; Jianan Grace Gang; Nicholas A Shkumat; Carlos A Varon; John Yorkston; Richard Van Metter; Narinder S Paul; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  The impact of calibration phantom errors on dual-energy digital mammography.

Authors:  Xuanqin Mou; Xi Chen; Lijun Sun; Hengyong Yu; Zhen Ji; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.