Literature DB >> 2385190

An accurate method for direct dual-energy calibration and decomposition.

H N Cardinal1, A Fenster.   

Abstract

We propose the use of conic and cubic surface equations (surfaces of second and third order) to directly approximate the dual-energy equations (the integral equations for the dual-energy log-signal functions, i.e., the negative logarithms of the relative detector signals, considered as functions of the basis-material component thicknesses of the object) and especially their inverses. These types of surface equations require a minimum number of calibration points, and their solutions are smooth, monotonic functions with the correct linear asymptotic behavior. The accuracy of this method is investigated and compared to that of conventional polynomial approximations, both for simulated and real calibration data, taken from two split-detector systems. These systems provide a more stringent test of our method than comparable dual-kVp systems, due to the greater nonlinearity of their log-signal and inverse functions. For these systems, we show that direct approximation of the inverse dual-energy equations using the simple eight-term rational form of the conic surface equation provides an extremely fast decomposition algorithm, which is accurate, robust in the presence of noise, and which can be calibrated with as few as 9 calibration points, or robustly calibrated, with a built-in accuracy check, using only 16 calibration points. Also, we show that extreme accuracy of approximation (to within less than 10(-6) in log-signal and 1 micron in material thickness) is theoretically attainable using the eighteen-term form of the cubic surface equation, which has a closed-form analytic solution. Finally, we consider the effects of noise on calibration accuracy, and derive simple formulas which relate the true and apparent root-mean-square (rms) accuracies. These formulas then allow the comparison of the true rms calibration accuracies of various surface approximations, considered as functions of the total calibration heat loading of the x-ray tube.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2385190     DOI: 10.1118/1.596512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of three different techniques for dual-energy subtraction imaging in digital radiography: a signal-to-noise analysis.

Authors:  C C Shaw; D Gur
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Cascaded systems analysis of noise and detectability in dual-energy cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Grace J Gang; Wojciech Zbijewski; J Webster Stayman; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Multi-layer imager design for mega-voltage spectral imaging.

Authors:  Marios Myronakis; Yue-Houng Hu; Rony Fueglistaller; Adam Wang; Paul Baturin; Pascal Huber; Daniel Morf; Josh Star-Lack; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Anniversary paper. Development of x-ray computed tomography: the role of medical physics and AAPM from the 1970s to present.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Jeffrey Siewerdsen; Patrick J La Riviere; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms--a signal-to-noise study.

Authors:  D S Breitenstein; C C Shaw
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Estimator for photon counting energy selective x-ray imaging with multibin pulse height analysis.

Authors:  Robert E Alvarez
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dual-energy cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector: effect of reconstruction algorithm on material classification.

Authors:  W Zbijewski; G J Gang; J Xu; A S Wang; J W Stayman; K Taguchi; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Radiation dose reduction using a CdZnTe-based computed tomography system: comparison to flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  Q Le Huy; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.