Literature DB >> 16625044

Evaluation of dual-energy subtraction of digital mammography images under conditions found in a commercial unit.

M-E Brandan1, V Ramírez-R.   

Abstract

Radiological contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is evaluated in subtracted images of microcalcifications in breast tissue. CNR is calculated for dual-kVp subtraction combining beams available in a Senographe 2000D, assuming single breast compression. Spectra were obtained from Boone et al (1997 Med. Phys. 24 1863-73), and the study was limited to lowest 25 kV Mo/Mo and highest 40 kV Rh/Rh beams, for 2.58 x 10(-4) C kg(-1) (1R) total exposure. For a standard case combining 25 kVp Mo/Mo and 40 kVp Rh/Rh beams, predicted maximum CNR for 300 microm calcification in 5 cm thick, 50% glandular, breast is about 1.2, below Rose's criterion for visualization. Total mean glandular doses are about 2.5 cGy for a standard case. The effect that input factors might have on predictions has been evaluated. Choice between alternative spectra can affect CNR by 50%. Assumed calcification composition leads to differences of 67% in calculated CNR, and assumed breast tissue composition can alter CNR by 45%; these results are weakly dependent on calcification or breast thickness, or on the assumed fraction of glandular tissue. CNR values are related to detected spectra effective energy. Calculations predict that above 37 kVp Mo/Mo beams are more energetic than Rh/Rh at the same kVp, due to beam hardening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16625044     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/9/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques.

Authors:  S Cheenu Kappadath; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of right ventricular abnormalities in Cx43 mutant mouse embryos.

Authors:  Youssef Zaim Wadghiri; Amanda E Schneider; Emily N Gray; Orlando Aristizabal; Cesar Berrios; Daniel H Turnbull; David E Gutstein
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  The impact of calibration phantom errors on dual-energy digital mammography.

Authors:  Xuanqin Mou; Xi Chen; Lijun Sun; Hengyong Yu; Zhen Ji; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  V Koukou; N Martini; C Michail; P Sotiropoulou; C Fountzoula; N Kalyvas; I Kandarakis; G Nikiforidis; G Fountos
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.