Literature DB >> 4010633

Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography.

P C Johns, M J Yaffe.   

Abstract

Detection of a target object in a radiological image is often impeded by an obscuring background "clutter" resulting from the contrast between various materials in the neighborhood of the target. Dual-energy techniques can reduce or remove this clutter. In order for the target to be detectable in the image after dual-energy processing, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), defined as the difference between the target and the background divided by the photon noise in the difference, must exceed some threshold. A given SNR may be obtained for a wide range of the energies of the two x-ray beams and the ratio of their fluences. A theoretical model is developed which permits the choice of beams to be optimized with respect to some critical parameter--in this case, patient dose. The analysis is applied to the detection of calcifications in mammography. For an ideal imaging system, we predict that the optimum beam energies are 19 and 68 keV. A dose of 0.42 cGy is required to obtain an SNR of 5 for detection of a 0.02-cm cubic calcification in the resulting clutter-free image. This can be reduced to 0.16 cGy if the higher energy image is smoothed, prior to dual-energy processing, such that its variance is reduced to one-fourth of its unsmoothed value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4010633     DOI: 10.1118/1.595766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

Review 1.  Digital mammography: current state and future aspects.

Authors:  U Fischer; K P Hermann; F Baum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Modeling and measurement of the detector presampling MTF of a variable resolution x-ray CT scanner.

Authors:  Roman Melnyk; Frank A DiBianca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images.

Authors:  Samuel Richard; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms--a signal-to-noise study.

Authors:  D S Breitenstein; C C Shaw
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Energy weighting improves dose efficiency in clinical practice: implementation on a spectral photon-counting mammography system.

Authors:  Johan Berglund; Henrik Johansson; Mats Lundqvist; Björn Cederström; Erik Fredenberg
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-08-28

8.  Statistical image-domain multimaterial decomposition for dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Yi Xue; Ruoshui Ruan; Xiuhua Hu; Yu Kuang; Jing Wang; Yong Long; Tianye Niu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dual-energy cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector: effect of reconstruction algorithm on material classification.

Authors:  W Zbijewski; G J Gang; J Xu; A S Wang; J W Stayman; K Taguchi; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques.

Authors:  S Cheenu Kappadath; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.