Literature DB >> 1879443

A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners.

D L Bailey1, T Jones, T J Spinks.   

Abstract

A need exists to measure the absolute sensitivity of a positron emission tomographic (PET) scanner in units of counts.s-1.MBq-1. At present sensitivity is generally determined by measurement of a radionuclide of known concentration distributed in a water-filled cylindrical phantom, usually 20 cm in diameter. The measurement is confounded by self-attenuation of the source and scatter within the cylinder and does not give a true absolute sensitivity measurement. Due to variations in the magnitude and treatment of these factors, meaningful comparison between different manufacturer's scanners is difficult, as are comparisons between different acquisition geometries (e.g. with and without interplane septa present). A method has been developed in our laboratory that provides measurements of absolute sensitivity in air for a scanner independent of attenuation and scatter within the source. The method involves measurements of a thin-line source of fluorine 18 contained within an aluminium housing to which successive aluminium sleeves are added. The extrapolation of these measurements allows an effective counts.s-1.MBq-1 measurement to be made for zero thickness of aluminium. Measurements have yielded absolute sensitivities of 3926 +/- 61 counts.s-1.MBq-1 (0.39% efficiency), 5079 +/- 26 counts.s-1.MBq-1 (0.51%), and 32312 +/- 544 counts.s-1.MBq-1 (3.2%) for a whole-body PET scanner with interplane septa and for a NeuroPET operating with and without interplane septa, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1879443     DOI: 10.1007/bf02258426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  8 in total

1.  Noise equivalent count measurements in a neuro-PET scanner with retractable septa.

Authors:  D L Bailey; T Jones; T J Spinks; M C Gilardi; D W Townsend
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Fully three-dimensional reconstruction for a PET camera with retractable septa.

Authors:  D W Townsend; A Geissbuhler; M Defrise; E J Hoffman; T J Spinks; D L Bailey; M C Gilardi; T Jones
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Quality control procedures in positron tomography.

Authors:  T Spinks; T Jones; J Heather; M Gilardi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

4.  Aspects of three dimensional reconstruction for a multi ring positron tomograph.

Authors:  D Townsend; T Spinks; T Jones; A Geissbühler; M Defrise; M C Gilardi; J Heather
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

5.  Sensitivity and cross calibration.

Authors:  A M Paans; D W Lamotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

6.  The application of a masked orbiting transmission source for attenuation correction in PET.

Authors:  N T Ranger; C J Thompson; A C Evans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Quantitative emission tomography.

Authors:  P H Murphy
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Subtraction of Compton-scattered photons in single-photon emission computerized tomography.

Authors:  B Axelsson; P Msaki; A Israelsson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 10.057

  8 in total
  20 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.

Authors:  A F Chatziioannou; S R Cherry; Y Shao; R W Silverman; K Meadors; T H Farquhar; M Pedarsani; M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Is PET the future of nuclear medicine?

Authors:  Dale L Bailey
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  3D acquisition and reconstruction in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Bailey
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  Performance characterization of the Inveon preclinical small-animal PET/SPECT/CT system for multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Keiichi Magota; Naoki Kubo; Yuji Kuge; Ken-Ichi Nishijima; Songji Zhao; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Marc C Huisman; Sybille Reder; Axel W Weber; Sibylle I Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Small animal PET: aspects of performance assessment.

Authors:  Simone Weber; Andreas Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Instrumentation for molecular imaging in preclinical research: Micro-PET and Micro-SPECT.

Authors:  Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2005

8.  Performance of the new generation of whole-body PET/CT scanners: Discovery STE and Discovery VCT.

Authors:  M Teräs; T Tolvanen; J J Johansson; J J Williams; J Knuuti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST.

Authors:  Valentino Bettinardi; Massimo Danna; Annarita Savi; Michela Lecchi; Isabella Castiglioni; Maria Carla Gilardi; Helmut Bammer; Giovanni Lucignani; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Quantitative SPECT/CT: SPECT joins PET as a quantitative imaging modality.

Authors:  Dale L Bailey; Kathy P Willowson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.