Literature DB >> 15517252

Small animal PET: aspects of performance assessment.

Simone Weber1, Andreas Bauer.   

Abstract

Dedicated small animal positron emission tomography (PET) systems are increasingly prevalent in industry (e.g. for preclinical drug development) and biological research. Such systems permit researchers to perform animal studies of a longitudinal design characterised by repeated measurements in single animals. With the advent of commercial systems, scanners have become readily available and increasingly popular. As a consequence, technical specifications are becoming more diverse, making scanner systems less broadly applicable. The investigator has, therefore, to make a decision regarding which type of scanner is most suitable for the intended experiments. This decision should be based on gantry characteristics and the physical performance. The first few steps have been taken towards standardisation of the assessment of performance characteristics of dedicated animal PET systems, though such assessment is not yet routinely implemented. In this review, we describe current methods of evaluation of physical performance parameters of small animal PET scanners. Effects of methodologically different approaches on the results are assessed. It is underscored that particular attention has to be paid to spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction and count rate performance. Differences in performance measurement methods are described with regard to commercially available systems, namely the Concorde MicroPET systems P4 and R4 and the quad-HIDAC. Lastly, consequences of differences in scanner performance parameters are rated with respect to applications of small animal PET.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517252     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-004-1683-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  28 in total

Review 1.  Radio-imaging in small animals.

Authors:  R Myers; S Hume; P Bloomfield; T Jones
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 2.  Molecular imaging of small animals with dedicated PET tomographs.

Authors:  Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  The biological application of small animal PET imaging.

Authors:  R Myers
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 4.  Dedicated small animal scanners: a new tool for drug development?

Authors:  S P Hume; R Myers
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Michael E Casey; Frank P DiFilippo; Horace Hines; Gerd Muehllehner; Vilim Simcic; Charles W Stearns; Lars-Eric Adam; Steve Kohlmyer; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Annihilation density distribution calculations for medically important positron emitters.

Authors:  M R Palmer; G L Brownell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  A prototype high-resolution animal positron tomograph with avalanche photodiode arrays and LSO crystals.

Authors:  S I Ziegler; B J Pichler; G Boening; M Rafecas; W Pimpl; E Lorenz; N Schmitz; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-02

8.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution.

Authors:  C S Levin; E J Hoffman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction.

Authors:  J S Liow; S C Strother
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The design and physical characteristics of a small animal positron emission tomograph.

Authors:  P M Bloomfield; S Rajeswaran; T J Spinks; S P Hume; R Myers; S Ashworth; K M Clifford; W F Jones; L G Byars; J Young
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of P-glycoprotein function and expression to elucidate mechanisms of pharmacoresistance in epilepsy.

Authors:  Wolfgang Löscher; Oliver Langer
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Marc C Huisman; Sybille Reder; Axel W Weber; Sibylle I Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  In vivo imaging of schistosomes to assess disease burden using positron emission tomography (PET).

Authors:  Nicolas Salem; Jason D Balkman; Jing Wang; David L Wilson; Zhenghong Lee; Christopher L King; James P Basilion
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-09-21

4.  Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner.

Authors:  Cristian C Constantinescu; Jogeshwar Mukherjee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A 18F-labeled saxitoxin derivative for in vivo PET-MR imaging of voltage-gated sodium channel expression following nerve injury.

Authors:  Aileen Hoehne; Deepak Behera; William H Parsons; Michelle L James; Bin Shen; Preeti Borgohain; Deepika Bodapati; Archana Prabhakar; Sanjiv S Gambhir; David C Yeomans; Sandip Biswal; Frederick T Chin; J Du Bois
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging in Rodents: A Review of Methods, Results, and Factors at Play.

Authors:  Francesco Cicone; David Viertl; Ana Maria Quintela Pousa; Thibaut Denoël; Silvano Gnesin; Francesco Scopinaro; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; John O Prior
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-03-29

7.  Rapid dissemination of Francisella tularensis and the effect of route of infection.

Authors:  Sandra S Ojeda; Zheng J Wang; Chris A Mares; Tingtung A Chang; Qun Li; Elizabeth G Morris; Paul A Jerabek; Judy M Teale
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 3.605

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.