Literature DB >> 10405138

Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.

A F Chatziioannou1, S R Cherry, Y Shao, R W Silverman, K Meadors, T H Farquhar, M Pedarsani, M E Phelps.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A new dedicated PET scanner, microPET, was designed and developed at the University of California, Los Angeles, for imaging small laboratory animals. The goal was to provide a compact system with superior spatial resolution at a fraction of the cost of a clinical PET scanner.
METHODS: The system uses fiberoptic readout of individually cut lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) crystals to achieve high spatial resolution. Each microPET detector consists of an 8 x 8 array of 2 x 2 x 10-mm LSO scintillation crystals that are coupled to a 64-channel photomultiplier tube by optical fibers. The tomograph consists of 30 detectors in a continuous ring with a 17.2-cm diameter and fields of view (FOVs) of 11.25 cm in the transaxial direction and 1.8 cm in the axial direction. The system has eight crystal rings and no interplane septa. It operates exclusively in the three-dimensional mode and has an electronically controlled bed that is capable of wobbling with a radius of 300 microm. We describe the performance of the tomograph in terms of its spatial, energy and timing resolution, as well as its sensitivity and counting-rate performance. We also illustrate its overall imaging performance with phantom and animal studies that demonstrate the potential applications of this device to biomedical research.
RESULTS: Images reconstructed with three-dimensional filtered backprojection show a spatial resolution of 1.8 mm at the center of the FOV (CFOV), which remains <2.5 mm for the central 5 cm of the transaxial FOV. The resulting volumetric resolution of the system is <8 microL. The absolute system sensitivity measured with a 0.74 MBq (20 microCi) 68Ge point source at the CFOV is 5.62 Hz/kBq. The maximum noise equivalent counting rate obtained with a 6.4-cm diameter cylinder spanning the central 56% of the FOV is 10 kcps, whereas the scatter fraction is 37% at the CFOV for an energy window of 250-650 keV and the same diameter cylinder.
CONCLUSION: This is the first PET scanner to use the new scintillator LSO and uses a novel detector design to achieve high volumetric spatial resolution. The combination of imaging characteristics of this prototype system (resolution, sensitivity, counting-rate performance and scatter fraction) opens up new possibilities in the study of animal models with PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10405138      PMCID: PMC3272501     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  16 in total

1.  Design features and performance of a PET system for animal research.

Authors:  P D Cutler; S R Cherry; E J Hoffman; W M Digby; M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Unified deadtime correction model for PET.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; R E Carson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  J S Karp; M E Daube-Witherspoon; E J Hoffman; T K Lewellen; J M Links; W H Wong; R D Hichwa; M E Casey; J G Colsher; R E Hitchens
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy; S R Cherry; A Chatziioannou; T H Farquhar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  The design and physical characteristics of a small animal positron emission tomograph.

Authors:  P M Bloomfield; S Rajeswaran; T J Spinks; S P Hume; R Myers; S Ashworth; K M Clifford; W F Jones; L G Byars; J Young
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A rotating PET scanner using BGO block detectors: design, performance and applications.

Authors:  D W Townsend; M Wensveen; L G Byars; A Geissbuhler; H J Tochon-Danguy; A Christin; M Defrise; D L Bailey; S Grootoonk; A Donath
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  T R DeGrado; T G Turkington; J J Williams; C W Stearns; J M Hoffman; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Determination of object contour from projections for attenuation correction in cranial positron emission tomography.

Authors:  M Bergström; J Litton; L Eriksson; C Bohm; G Blomqvist
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  The design of an animal PET: flexible geometry for achieving optimal spatial resolution or high sensitivity.

Authors:  S Weber; A Terstegge; H Herzog; R Reinartz; P Reinhart; F Rongen; H W Müller-Gärtner; H Halling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  High-resolution PET imaging and quantitation of pharmaceutical biodistributions in a small animal using avalanche photodiode detectors.

Authors:  C J Marriott; J E Cadorette; R Lecomte; V Scasnar; J Rousseau; J E van Lier
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Imaging transgene expression with radionuclide imaging technologies.

Authors:  S S Gambhir; H R Herschman; S R Cherry; J R Barrio; N Satyamurthy; T Toyokuni; M E Phelps; S M Larson; J Balatoni; R Finn; M Sadelain; J Tjuvajev; R Blasberg
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  PET imaging in small animals.

Authors:  Heinrich R Schelbert; Masayuki Inubushi; Robert S Ross
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  From PET detectors to PET scanners.

Authors:  John L Humm; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Alberto Del Guerra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo; Pedro Andreo; Stig A Larsson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Molecular imaging: a view from the inside.

Authors:  Harvey R Herschman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Preclinical lymphatic imaging.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Gang Niu; Guangming Lu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  PET Performance Evaluation of an MR-Compatible PET Insert.

Authors:  Yibao Wu; Ciprian Catana; Richard Farrell; Purushottam A Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 1.679

8.  A Prototype Detector for a Novel High-Resolution PET System: BazookaPET.

Authors:  Ryeojin Park; Brian W Miller; Abhinav K Jha; Lars R Furenlid; William C J Hunter; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2012 Oct-Nov

Review 9.  Imaging stem cells implanted in infarcted myocardium.

Authors:  Rong Zhou; Paul D Acton; Victor A Ferrari
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Calling for help is independently modulated by brain systems underlying goal-directed behavior and threat perception.

Authors:  Andrew S Fox; Terrence R Oakes; Steven E Shelton; Alexander K Converse; Richard J Davidson; Ned H Kalin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.