Literature DB >> 18682956

Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT.

David Maintz1, Matthias C Burg, Harald Seifarth, Alexander C Bunck, Murat Ozgün, Roman Fischbach, Kai Uwe Jürgens, Walter Heindel.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test a large sample of the latest coronary artery stents using four image reconstruction approaches with respect to lumen visualization, lumen attenuation, and image noise in dual-source multidetector row CT (DSCT) in vitro and to provide a CT catalogue of currently used coronary artery stents. Twenty-nine different coronary artery stents (19 steel, 6 cobalt-chromium, 2 tantalum, 1 iron, 1 magnesium) were examined in a coronary artery phantom (vessel diameter 3 mm, intravascular attenuation 250 HU, extravascular density -70 HU). Stents were imaged in axial orientation with standard parameters: 32 x 0.6 collimation, pitch 0.24, 400 mAs, 120 kV, rotation time 0.33 s. Image reconstructions were obtained with four different convolution kernels (soft, medium-soft, standard high-resolution, stent-dedicated). To evaluate visualization characteristics of the stent, the lumen diameter, intraluminal density, and noise were measured. The stent-dedicated kernel offered best average lumen visualization (54 +/- 8.3%) and most realistic lumen attenuation (222 +/- 44 HU) at the expense of increased noise (23.9 +/- 1.9 HU) compared with standard CTA protocols (p < 0.001 for all). The magnesium stent showed the least artifacts with a lumen visibility of 90%. The majority of stents (79%) exhibited a lumen visibility of 50-59%. Less than half of the stent lumen was visible in only six stents. Stent lumen visibility largely varies depending on the stent type. Magnesium is by far more favorable a stent material with regard to CT imaging when compared with the more common materials steel, cobalt-chromium, or tantalum. The magnesium stent exhibits a lumen visibility of 90%, whereas the majority of the other stents exhibit a lumen visibility of 50-59%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18682956     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1132-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

1.  Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Martine Gilard; Jean Christophe Cornily; Gilles Rioufol; Gerard Finet; Pierre Yves Pennec; Jacques Mansourati; Jean Jacques Blanc; Jacques Boschat
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter.

Authors:  Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Stefan Schaller; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience.

Authors:  Harald Seifarth; Murat Ozgün; Rainer Raupach; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Carsten Rist; Franz von Ziegler; Konstantin Nikolaou; Miles A Kirchin; Bernd J Wintersperger; Thorsten R Johnson; Andreas Knez; Alexander W Leber; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience.

Authors:  Dilek Oncel; Guray Oncel; Mustafa Karaca
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Filippo Cademartiri; Nico R Mollet; Patrizia Malagutti; Marco Valgimigli; Willem B Meijboom; Francesca Pugliese; Eugene P McFadden; Jurgen Ligthart; Giuseppe Runza; Nico Bruining; Pieter C Smits; Evelyn Regar; Willem J van der Giessen; Georgios Sianos; Ron van Domburg; Peter de Jaegere; Gabriel P Krestin; Patrick W Serruys; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Hazem M A Warda; Hubert W Vliegen; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Stephen G Ellis; David A Cox; James Hermiller; Charles O'Shaughnessy; James Tift Mann; Mark Turco; Ronald Caputo; Patrick Bergin; Joel Greenberg; Jeffrey J Popma; Mary E Russell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Nazario Carrabba; Mohamed Bamoshmoosh; Luca Maria Carusi; Guido Parodi; Renato Valenti; Angela Migliorini; Fabio Fanfani; David Antoniucci
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography.

Authors:  D Maintz; M Grude; E M Fallenberg; W Heindel; R Fischbach
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  19 in total

1.  Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Paola M Cannaó; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Christian Canstein; Stephen R Fuller; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Akos Varga-Szemes; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  High diagnostic accuracy of prospective ECG-gating 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: in-stent restenosis assessment by low-dose MDCT.

Authors:  Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Antonio L Bartorelli; Saima Mushtaq; Daniela Trabattoni; Erika Bertella; Sarah Cortinovis; Andrea Annoni; Alberto Formenti; Giovanni Ballerini; Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Cesare Fiorentini; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  In vivo evaluation of stent patency by 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography: shall we do it or not?

Authors:  Jiayin Zhang; Minghua Li; Zhigang Lu; Jingyu Hang; Jingwei Pan; Leiqing Sun
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Image quality in coronary CT angiography: challenges and technical solutions.

Authors:  Olivier Ghekiere; Rodrigo Salgado; Nico Buls; Tim Leiner; Isabelle Mancini; Piet Vanhoenacker; Paul Dendale; Alain Nchimi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Influence of cardiac motion on stent lumen visualization in third generation dual-source CT employing a pulsatile heart model.

Authors:  Nils Petri; Tobias Gassenmaier; Thomas Allmendinger; Thomas Flohr; Wolfram Voelker; Thorsten A Bley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Initial exploration of coronary stent image subtraction using dual-layer spectral CT.

Authors:  Le Qin; ShengJia Gu; ChiHua Chen; Huan Zhang; ZhenBin Zhu; XingBiao Chen; Qun Han; FuHua Yan; WenJie Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Next generation coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 27 coronary stents.

Authors:  Tobias Gassenmaier; Nils Petri; Thomas Allmendinger; Thomas Flohr; David Maintz; Wolfram Voelker; Thorsten A Bley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A noise-optimized virtual monochromatic reconstruction algorithm improves stent visualization and diagnostic accuracy for detection of in-stent re-stenosis in lower extremity run-off CT angiography.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Carlo N De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; Ricardo T Yamada; Akos Varga-Szemes; Andrew C Stubenrauch; Damiano Caruso; Stephen R Fuller; Thomas J Vogl; Konstantin Nikolaou; Thomas M Todoran; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode.

Authors:  Florian Wolf; Sebastian Leschka; Christian Loewe; Peter Homolka; Christina Plank; Ruediger Schernthaner; Dominik Bercaczy; Robert Goetti; Johannes Lammer; Guy Friedrich; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Gudrun Feuchtner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  In vitro stent lumen visualisation of various common and newly developed femoral artery stents using MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 tesla.

Authors:  R Syha; D Ketelsen; M Kaempf; S Mangold; S Sixt; T Zeller; F Springer; F Schick; C D Claussen; K Brechtel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.