Literature DB >> 16894038

Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.

Carlos A G Van Mieghem1, Filippo Cademartiri, Nico R Mollet, Patrizia Malagutti, Marco Valgimigli, Willem B Meijboom, Francesca Pugliese, Eugene P McFadden, Jurgen Ligthart, Giuseppe Runza, Nico Bruining, Pieter C Smits, Evelyn Regar, Willem J van der Giessen, Georgios Sianos, Ron van Domburg, Peter de Jaegere, Gabriel P Krestin, Patrick W Serruys, Pim J de Feyter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surveillance conventional coronary angiography (CCA) is recommended 2 to 6 months after stent-supported left main coronary artery (LMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention due to the unpredictable occurrence of in-stent restenosis (ISR), with its attendant risks. Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a promising technique for noninvasive coronary evaluation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of high-resolution MSCT to detect ISR after stenting of the LMCA. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were prospectively identified from a consecutive patient population scheduled for follow-up CCA after LMCA stenting and underwent MSCT before CCA. Until August 2004, a 16-slice scanner was used (n = 27), but we switched to the 64-slice scanner after that period (n = 43). Patients with initial heart rates > 65 bpm received beta-blockers, which resulted in a mean periscan heart rate of 57 +/- 7 bpm. Among patients with technically adequate scans (n = 70), MSCT correctly identified all patients with ISR (10 of 70) but misclassified 5 patients without ISR (false-positives). Overall, the accuracy of MSCT for detection of angiographic ISR was 93%. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 91%, 67%, and 100%, respectively. When analysis was restricted to patients with stenting of the LMCA with or without extension into a single major side branch, accuracy was 98%. When both branches of the LMCA bifurcation were stented, accuracy was 83%. For the assessment of stent diameter and area, MSCT showed good correlation with intravascular ultrasound (r = 0.78 and 0.73, respectively). An intravascular ultrasound threshold value > or = 1 mm was identified to reliably detect in-stent neointima hyperplasia with MSCT.
CONCLUSIONS: Current MSCT technology, in combination with optimal heart rate control, allows reliable noninvasive evaluation of selected patients after LMCA stenting. MSCT is safe to exclude left main ISR and may therefore be an acceptable first-line alternative to CCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16894038     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.608950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  24 in total

1.  [Imaging of coronary stents using multislice computed tomography].

Authors:  H Seifarth; W Heindel; D Maintz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Use of high-resolution spiral CT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Willem B Meijboom; Niels van Pelt; Pim de Feyter
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-02

4.  In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.

Authors:  T Schlosser; T Scheuermann; S Ulzheimer; O K Mohrs; M Kühling; P E Albrecht; T Voigtländer; J Barkhausen; A Schmermund
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Non-significant left main disease; truly non-significant?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J W Jukema; J J Bax; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  The 'what, when, where, who and how?' of cardiac computed tomography in 2009: guidelines for the clinician.

Authors:  B J W Chow; E Larose; S Bilodeau; M L Ellins; P Galiwango; M Kass; T Sheth; D S Jassal; I D C Kirkpatrick; G B John Mancini; J Mayo; A Abraham; J White
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Woocheol Kwon; Jiyoun Choi; Jang-Young Kim; Seong-Yoon Kim; Junghan Yoon; Kyoung-Hoon Choe; Seung Hwan Lee; Sung Gyun Ahn
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography.

Authors:  Iacopo Carbone; Marco Francone; Emanuela Algeri; Antonino Granatelli; Alessandro Napoli; Miles A Kirchin; Carlo Catalano; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Laure Champ-Rigot; Rémy Morello; John W Riddell; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nazario Carrabba; Joanne D Schuijf; Fleur R de Graaf; Guido Parodi; Erica Maffei; Renato Valenti; Alessandro Palumbo; Annick C Weustink; Nico R Mollet; Gabriele Accetta; Filippo Cademartiri; David Antoniucci; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.