Stefanie Mangold1,2, Carlo N De Cecco1, U Joseph Schoepf3,4, Ricardo T Yamada1, Akos Varga-Szemes1, Andrew C Stubenrauch1, Damiano Caruso1,5, Stephen R Fuller1, Thomas J Vogl1,6, Konstantin Nikolaou2, Thomas M Todoran7, Julian L Wichmann1,6. 1. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA. schoepf@musc.edu. 4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. schoepf@musc.edu. 5. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy. 6. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. 7. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of noise-optimized virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI+) on stent visualization and accuracy for in-stent re-stenosis at lower extremity dual-energy CT angiography (DE-CTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated third-generation dual-source DE-CTA studies in 31 patients with prior stent placement. Images were reconstructed with linear blending (F_0.5) and VMI+ at 40-150 keV. In-stent luminal diameter was measured and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculated. Diagnostic confidence was determined using a five-point scale. In 21 patients with invasive catheter angiography, accuracy for significant re-stenosis (≥50 %) was assessed at F_0.5 and 80 keV-VMI+ chosen as the optimal energy level based on image-quality analysis. RESULTS: At CTA, 45 stents were present. DSA was available for 28 stents whereas 12 stents showed significant re-stenosis. CNR was significantly higher with ≤80 keV-VMI+ (17.9 ± 6.4-33.7 ± 12.3) compared to F_0.5 (16.9 ± 4.8; all p < 0.0463); luminal stent diameters were increased at ≥70 keV (5.41 ± 1.8-5.92 ± 1.7 vs. 5.27 ± 1.8, all p < 0.001) and diagnostic confidence was highest at 70-80 keV-VMI+ (4.90 ± 0.48-4.88 ± 0.63 vs. 4.60 ± 0.66, p = 0.001, 0.0042). Sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy for re-stenosis were higher with 80 keV-VMI+ (100, 100, 96.4 %) than F_0.5 (90.9, 94.1, 89.3 %). CONCLUSION: 80 keV-VMI+ improves image quality, diagnostic confidence and accuracy for stent evaluation at lower extremity DE-CTA. KEY POINTS: • The impact of noise-optimized virtual monochromatic imaging on stent visualization was assessed. • Virtual monochromatic imaging significantly improves stent lumen visualization and diagnostic confidence. • At 80 keV diagnostic performance for detection of in-stent restenosis was increased. • 80 keV virtual monochromatic images are recommended for stent evaluation of lower extremity vasculature.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of noise-optimized virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI+) on stent visualization and accuracy for in-stent re-stenosis at lower extremity dual-energy CT angiography (DE-CTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated third-generation dual-source DE-CTA studies in 31 patients with prior stent placement. Images were reconstructed with linear blending (F_0.5) and VMI+ at 40-150 keV. In-stent luminal diameter was measured and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculated. Diagnostic confidence was determined using a five-point scale. In 21 patients with invasive catheter angiography, accuracy for significant re-stenosis (≥50 %) was assessed at F_0.5 and 80 keV-VMI+ chosen as the optimal energy level based on image-quality analysis. RESULTS: At CTA, 45 stents were present. DSA was available for 28 stents whereas 12 stents showed significant re-stenosis. CNR was significantly higher with ≤80 keV-VMI+ (17.9 ± 6.4-33.7 ± 12.3) compared to F_0.5 (16.9 ± 4.8; all p < 0.0463); luminal stent diameters were increased at ≥70 keV (5.41 ± 1.8-5.92 ± 1.7 vs. 5.27 ± 1.8, all p < 0.001) and diagnostic confidence was highest at 70-80 keV-VMI+ (4.90 ± 0.48-4.88 ± 0.63 vs. 4.60 ± 0.66, p = 0.001, 0.0042). Sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy for re-stenosis were higher with 80 keV-VMI+ (100, 100, 96.4 %) than F_0.5 (90.9, 94.1, 89.3 %). CONCLUSION: 80 keV-VMI+ improves image quality, diagnostic confidence and accuracy for stent evaluation at lower extremity DE-CTA. KEY POINTS: • The impact of noise-optimized virtual monochromatic imaging on stent visualization was assessed. • Virtual monochromatic imaging significantly improves stent lumen visualization and diagnostic confidence. • At 80 keV diagnostic performance for detection of in-stent restenosis was increased. • 80 keV virtual monochromatic images are recommended for stent evaluation of lower extremity vasculature.
Authors: Martin Beeres; Jesko Trommer; Claudia Frellesen; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Jan E Scholtz; Eva Herrmann; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Tobias Pflederer; Mohamed Marwan; Alexandra Renz; Sven Bachmann; Dieter Ropers; Axel Kuettner; Katharina Anders; Fabian Bamberg; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-01-24 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Julia Stehli; Tobias A Fuchs; Adrian Singer; Sacha Bull; Olivier F Clerc; Mathias Possner; Oliver Gaemperli; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M Gilard; J C Cornily; P Y Pennec; G Le Gal; M Nonent; J Mansourati; J J Blanc; J Boschat Journal: Heart Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Mathias Meyer; Holger Haubenreisser; U Joseph Schoepf; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Christianne Leidecker; Thomas Allmendinger; Ralf Lehmann; Sonja Sudarski; Martin Borggrefe; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sonja Sudarski; Paul Apfaltrer; John W Nance; David Schneider; Mathias Meyer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Christian Fink; Thomas Henzler Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Domenico De Santis; Carlo N De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; John W Nance; Ricardo T Yamada; Brooke A Thomas; Katharina Otani; Brian E Jacobs; D Alan Turner; Julian L Wichmann; Marwen Eid; Akos Varga-Szemes; Damiano Caruso; Katharine L Grant; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas J Vogl; Andrea Laghi; Moritz H Albrecht Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: André Euler; Markus M Obmann; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Achille Mileto; Caroline Zaehringer; Anna L Falkowski; David J Winkel; Daniele Marin; Bram Stieltjes; Bernhard Krauss; Sebastian T Schindera Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Domenico De Santis; Damiano Caruso; U Joseph Schoepf; Marwen Eid; Moritz H Albrecht; Taylor M Duguay; Akos Varga-Szemes; Andrea Laghi; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Andreas M Bucher; Lukas Lenga; Christophe T Arendt; Julia L Peterke; Damiano Caruso; Silvio Mazziotti; Alfredo Blandino; Giorgio Ascenti; Ahmed E Othman; Simon S Martin; Doris Leithner; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mareen Kraus; Jakob Weiss; Nadja Selo; Thomas Flohr; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Ahmed E Othman Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 2.804