Literature DB >> 20397019

Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode.

Florian Wolf1, Sebastian Leschka, Christian Loewe, Peter Homolka, Christina Plank, Ruediger Schernthaner, Dominik Bercaczy, Robert Goetti, Johannes Lammer, Guy Friedrich, Borut Marincek, Hatem Alkadhi, Gudrun Feuchtner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate coronary stents in vitro using 128-slice-dual-source computed tomography (CT).
METHODS: Twelve different coronary stents placed in a non-moving cardiac/chest phantom were examined by 128-slice dual-source CT using three CT protocols [high-pitch spiral (HPS), sequential (SEQ) and conventional spiral (SPIR)]. Artificial in-stent lumen narrowing (ALN), visible inner stent area (VIA), artificial in-stent lumen attenuation (ALA) in percent, image noise inside/outside the stent and CTDIvol were measured.
RESULTS: Mean ALN was 46% for HPS, 44% for SEQ and 47% for SPIR without significant difference. Mean VIA was similar with 31% for HPS, 30% for SEQ and 33% for SPIR. Mean ALA was, at 5% for HPS, significantly lower compared with -11% for SPIR (p = 0.024), but not different from SEQ with -1%. Mean image noise was significantly higher for HPS compared with SEQ and SPIR inside and outside the stent (p < 0.001). CTDIvol was lower for HPS (5.17 mGy), compared with SEQ (9.02 mGy) and SPIR (55.97 mGy), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The HPS mode of 128-slice dual-source CT yields fewer artefacts inside the stent lumen compared with SPIR and SEQ, but image noise is higher. ALN is still too high for routine stent evaluation in clinical practice. Radiation dose of the HPS mode is markedly (less than about tenfold) reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20397019     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1792-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

1.  64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience.

Authors:  Harald Seifarth; Murat Ozgün; Rainer Raupach; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?

Authors:  Florian Wolf; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Peter Homolka; Herbert Langenberger; Alfred Stadler; Till R Bader; Michael Weber; Johannes Lammer; Christian Loewe
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries.

Authors:  Harvey S Hecht; Maja Zaric; Vladimir Jelnin; Lev Lubarsky; Manish Prakash; Gary Roubin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Dirk Ertel; Michael M Lell; Frank Harig; Thomas Flohr; Bernhard Schmidt; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Coronary stent patency: dual-energy multidetector CT assessment in a pilot study with anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  Daniel T Boll; Elmar M Merkle; Erik K Paulson; Thorsten R Fleiter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.

Authors:  David Maintz; Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Thomas Flohr; Michael Rink; Torsten Sommer; Murat Ozgün; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population.

Authors:  Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Thorarinn Gudnason; Axel F Sigurdsson; Jonina Gudjonsdottir; Sam J Lehman; Kristjan Eyjolfsson; Sigurpall S Scheving; C Michael Gibson; Udo Hoffmann; Birna Jonsdottir; Karl Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  F Pugliese; A C Weustink; C Van Mieghem; F Alberghina; M Otsuka; W B Meijboom; N van Pelt; N R Mollet; F Cademartiri; G P Krestin; M G M Hunink; P J de Feyter
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Nazario Carrabba; Mohamed Bamoshmoosh; Luca Maria Carusi; Guido Parodi; Renato Valenti; Angela Migliorini; Fabio Fanfani; David Antoniucci
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Tobias Pflederer; Larissa Rudofsky; Dieter Ropers; Sven Bachmann; Mohamed Marwan; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  10 in total

1.  CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Ullrich Ebersberger; Francesco Tricarico; U Joseph Schoepf; Philipp Blanke; J Reid Spears; Garrett W Rowe; William T Halligan; Thomas Henzler; Fabian Bamberg; Alexander W Leber; Ellen Hoffmann; Paul Apfaltrer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography - what has been achieved and what needs to be done.

Authors:  Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Accuracy, image quality and radiation dose comparison of high-pitch spiral and sequential acquisition on 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Pei Nie; Ximing Wang; Zhaoping Cheng; Xiaopeng Ji; Yanhua Duan; Jiuhong Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Assessment of coronary artery by prospective ECG-triggered 256 multi-slice CT on children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Li-Ping Yao; Li Zhang; Hui-Ming Li; Ming Ding; Ling-Wei Yu; Xin Yang; Xiao-Ming Li; Kun Sun
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-11

6.  A systematic approach for analysis, interpretation, and reporting of coronary CTA studies.

Authors:  Christoph A Karlo; Sebastian Leschka; Paul Stolzmann; Nicola Glaser-Gallion; Simon Wildermuth; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-05-01

7.  Application of prospective ECG-gated high-pitch 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in the diagnosis of congenital extracardiac vascular anomalies in infants and children.

Authors:  Pei Nie; Guangjie Yang; Ximing Wang; Yanhua Duan; Wenjian Xu; Haiou Li; Ting Cao; Xuejun Liu; Xiaopeng Ji; Zhaoping Cheng; Anbiao Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Energy Limits in Second Generation High-pitch Dual Source CT - Comparison in an Upper Abdominal Phantom.

Authors:  Martin Beeres; Ralf W Bauer; Josef M Kerl; Thomas J Vogl; Clara Lee
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2015-01-30

9.  Performance of dual-source CT with high pitch spiral mode for coronary stent patency compared with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Xia Yang; Qiang Yu; Wei Dong; Zhen-Hong Fu; Jun-Jue Yang; Jun Guo; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rates: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated spiral acquisition mode.

Authors:  Kai Sun; Rui-Juan Han; Li-Jun Ma; Li-Jun Wang; Li-Gang Li; Jiu-Hong Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.