OBJECTIVE: To evaluate coronary stents in vitro using 128-slice-dual-source computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Twelve different coronary stents placed in a non-moving cardiac/chest phantom were examined by 128-slice dual-source CT using three CT protocols [high-pitch spiral (HPS), sequential (SEQ) and conventional spiral (SPIR)]. Artificial in-stent lumen narrowing (ALN), visible inner stent area (VIA), artificial in-stent lumen attenuation (ALA) in percent, image noise inside/outside the stent and CTDIvol were measured. RESULTS: Mean ALN was 46% for HPS, 44% for SEQ and 47% for SPIR without significant difference. Mean VIA was similar with 31% for HPS, 30% for SEQ and 33% for SPIR. Mean ALA was, at 5% for HPS, significantly lower compared with -11% for SPIR (p = 0.024), but not different from SEQ with -1%. Mean image noise was significantly higher for HPS compared with SEQ and SPIR inside and outside the stent (p < 0.001). CTDIvol was lower for HPS (5.17 mGy), compared with SEQ (9.02 mGy) and SPIR (55.97 mGy), respectively. CONCLUSION: The HPS mode of 128-slice dual-source CT yields fewer artefacts inside the stent lumen compared with SPIR and SEQ, but image noise is higher. ALN is still too high for routine stent evaluation in clinical practice. Radiation dose of the HPS mode is markedly (less than about tenfold) reduced.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate coronary stents in vitro using 128-slice-dual-source computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Twelve different coronary stents placed in a non-moving cardiac/chest phantom were examined by 128-slice dual-source CT using three CT protocols [high-pitch spiral (HPS), sequential (SEQ) and conventional spiral (SPIR)]. Artificial in-stent lumen narrowing (ALN), visible inner stent area (VIA), artificial in-stent lumen attenuation (ALA) in percent, image noise inside/outside the stent and CTDIvol were measured. RESULTS: Mean ALN was 46% for HPS, 44% for SEQ and 47% for SPIR without significant difference. Mean VIA was similar with 31% for HPS, 30% for SEQ and 33% for SPIR. Mean ALA was, at 5% for HPS, significantly lower compared with -11% for SPIR (p = 0.024), but not different from SEQ with -1%. Mean image noise was significantly higher for HPS compared with SEQ and SPIR inside and outside the stent (p < 0.001). CTDIvol was lower for HPS (5.17 mGy), compared with SEQ (9.02 mGy) and SPIR (55.97 mGy), respectively. CONCLUSION: The HPS mode of 128-slice dual-source CT yields fewer artefacts inside the stent lumen compared with SPIR and SEQ, but image noise is higher. ALN is still too high for routine stent evaluation in clinical practice. Radiation dose of the HPS mode is markedly (less than about tenfold) reduced.
Authors: Harald Seifarth; Murat Ozgün; Rainer Raupach; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Florian Wolf; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Peter Homolka; Herbert Langenberger; Alfred Stadler; Till R Bader; Michael Weber; Johannes Lammer; Christian Loewe Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2007-10-29 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Harvey S Hecht; Maja Zaric; Vladimir Jelnin; Lev Lubarsky; Manish Prakash; Gary Roubin Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-01-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Dirk Ertel; Michael M Lell; Frank Harig; Thomas Flohr; Bernhard Schmidt; Willi A Kalender Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: David Maintz; Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Thomas Flohr; Michael Rink; Torsten Sommer; Murat Ozgün; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-12-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Thorarinn Gudnason; Axel F Sigurdsson; Jonina Gudjonsdottir; Sam J Lehman; Kristjan Eyjolfsson; Sigurpall S Scheving; C Michael Gibson; Udo Hoffmann; Birna Jonsdottir; Karl Andersen Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: F Pugliese; A C Weustink; C Van Mieghem; F Alberghina; M Otsuka; W B Meijboom; N van Pelt; N R Mollet; F Cademartiri; G P Krestin; M G M Hunink; P J de Feyter Journal: Heart Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Ullrich Ebersberger; Francesco Tricarico; U Joseph Schoepf; Philipp Blanke; J Reid Spears; Garrett W Rowe; William T Halligan; Thomas Henzler; Fabian Bamberg; Alexander W Leber; Ellen Hoffmann; Paul Apfaltrer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christoph A Karlo; Sebastian Leschka; Paul Stolzmann; Nicola Glaser-Gallion; Simon Wildermuth; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2012-05-01