Literature DB >> 25147474

Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Wayne D Newhauser1, Laura Rechner2, Dragan Mirkovic2, Pablo Yepes3, Nicholas C Koch4, Uwe Titt2, Jonas D Fontenot5, Rui Zhang5.   

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulations are increasingly used for dose calculations in proton therapy due to its inherent accuracy. However, dosimetric deviations have been found using Monte Carlo code when high density materials are present in the proton beam line. The purpose of this work was to quantify the magnitude of dose perturbation caused by metal objects. We did this by comparing measurements and Monte Carlo predictions of dose perturbations caused by the presence of small metal spheres in several clinical proton therapy beams as functions of proton beam range, spread-out Bragg peak width and drift space. Monte Carlo codes MCNPX, GEANT4 and Fast Dose Calculator (FDC) were used. Generally good agreement was found between measurements and Monte Carlo predictions, with the average difference within 5% and maximum difference within 17%. The modification of multiple Coulomb scattering model in MCNPX code yielded improvement in accuracy and provided the best overall agreement with measurements. Our results confirmed that Monte Carlo codes are well suited for predicting multiple Coulomb scattering in proton therapy beams when short drift spaces are involved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulation; Proton beam; dose perturbation; multiple Coulomb scattering

Year:  2013        PMID: 25147474      PMCID: PMC4136527          DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Meas        ISSN: 1350-4487            Impact factor:   1.898


  48 in total

1.  Secondary electron fluence perturbation by high-Z interfaces in clinical proton beams: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  F Verhaegen; H Palmans
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The design and testing of novel clinical parameters for dose comparison.

Authors:  Nathan L Childress; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Differential-pencil-beam dose calculations for charged particles.

Authors:  P L Petti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.

Authors:  J S Li; B Shahine; E Fourkal; C-M Ma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Monte Carlo modelling of the treatment line of the Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.

Authors:  A Stankovskiy; S Kerhoas-Cavata; R Ferrand; C Nauraye; L Demarzi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Proton radiography.

Authors:  A M Koehler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-04-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Monte Carlo and analytical calculation of proton pencil beams for computerized treatment plan optimization.

Authors:  A K Carlsson; P Andreo; A Brahme
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Monte Carlo simulation of a protontherapy platform devoted to ocular melanoma.

Authors:  J Hérault; N Iborra; B Serrano; P Chauvel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Monte Carlo fast dose calculator for proton radiotherapy: application to a voxelized geometry representing a patient with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pablo Yepes; Sharmalee Randeniya; Phillip J Taddei; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Development and verification of an analytical algorithm to predict absorbed dose distributions in ocular proton therapy using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Nicholas C Koch; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Inter-Institutional Comparison of Personalized Risk Assessments for Second Malignant Neoplasms for a 13-Year-Old Girl Receiving Proton versus Photon Craniospinal Irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Nabil Khater; Rui Zhang; Fady B Geara; Anita Mahajan; Wassim Jalbout; Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Bassem Youssef; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.