Literature DB >> 12030561

Proton beam dosimetry for radiosurgery: implementation of the ICRU Report 59 at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory.

Wayne D Newhauser1, Karla D Myers, Stanley J Rosenthal, Alfred R Smith.   

Abstract

Recent proton dosimetry intercomparisons have demonstrated that the adoption of a common protocol, e.g. ICRU Report 59, can lead to improved consistency in absorbed dose determinations. We compared absorbed dose values, measured in the 160 MeV proton radiosurgery beamline at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory, based on ionization chamber methods with those from a Faraday cup technique. The Faraday cup method is based on a proton fluence determination that allows the estimation of absorbed dose with the CEMA approximation, under which the dose is equal to the fluence times the mean mass stopping power. The ionization chamber technique employs an air-kerma calibration coefficient for 60Co radiation and a calculated correction in order to take into account the differences in response to 60Co and proton beam radiations. The absorbed dose to water, based on a diode measurement calibrated with a Faraday cup technique, is approximately 2% higher than was obtained from an ionization chamber measurement. At the Bragg peak depth, the techniques agree to within their respective uncertainties, which are both approximately 4% (1 standard deviation). The ionization chamber technique exhibited superior reproducibility and was adopted in our standard clinical practice for radiosurgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12030561     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/8/310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Adjustment of the lateral and longitudinal size of scanned proton beam spots using a pre-absorber to optimize penumbrae and delivery efficiency.

Authors:  Uwe Titt; Dragan Mirkovic; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Luis A Perles; Wayne D Newhauser; Phillip J Taddei; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Independent dose per monitor unit review of eight U.S.A. proton treatment facilities.

Authors:  M F Moyers; G S Ibbott; R L Grant; P A Summers; D S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Water equivalent thickness values of materials used in beams of protons, helium, carbon and iron ions.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Phillip J Taddei; Markus M Fitzek; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Uncertainties and correction methods when modeling passive scattering proton therapy treatment heads with Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Martijn Engelsman; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions.

Authors:  U Titt; N Sahoo; X Ding; Y Zheng; W D Newhauser; X R Zhu; J C Polf; M T Gillin; R Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Development and verification of an analytical algorithm to predict absorbed dose distributions in ocular proton therapy using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Nicholas C Koch; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Dosimetric Characteristics of a Two-Dimensional Diode Array Detector Irradiated with Passively Scattered Proton Beams.

Authors:  Praimakorn Liengsawangwong; Nanayan Sahoo; Xiaoning Ding; MingFwu Lii; Michale T Gillin; Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.