Literature DB >> 20865142

Effective Dose from Stray Radiation for a Patient Receiving Proton Therapy for Liver Cancer.

Phillip J Taddei1, Sunil Krishnan, Dragan Mirkovic, Pablo Yepes, Wayne D Newhauser.   

Abstract

Because of its advantageous depth-dose relationship, proton radiotherapy is an emerging treatment modality for patients with liver cancer. Although the proton dose distribution conforms to the target, healthy tissues throughout the body receive low doses of stray radiation, particularly neutrons that originate in the treatment unit or in the patient. The aim of this study was to calculate the effective dose from stray radiation and estimate the corresponding risk of second cancer fatality for a patient receiving proton beam therapy for liver cancer. Effective dose from stray radiation was calculated using detailed Monte Carlo simulations of a double-scattering proton therapy treatment unit and a voxelized human phantom. The treatment plan and phantom were based on CT images of an actual adult patient diagnosed with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. For a prescribed dose of 60 Gy to the clinical target volume, the effective dose from stray radiation was 370 mSv; 61% of this dose was from neutrons originating outside of the patient while the remaining 39% was from neutrons originating within the patient. The excess lifetime risk of fatal second cancer corresponding to the total effective dose from stray radiation was 1.2%. The results of this study establish a baseline estimate of the stray radiation dose and corresponding risk for an adult patient undergoing proton radiotherapy for liver cancer and provide new evidence to corroborate the suitability of proton beam therapy for the treatment of liver tumors.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20865142      PMCID: PMC2943390          DOI: 10.1063/1.3120070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIP Conf Proc        ISSN: 0094-243X


  24 in total

1.  Virtual commissioning of a treatment planning system for proton therapy of ocular cancers.

Authors:  N Koch; W Newhauser
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Design tools for proton therapy nozzles based on the double-scattering foil technique.

Authors:  J D Fontenot; W D Newhauser; U Titt
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Spread-out Bragg peak and monitor units calculation with the Monte Carlo code MCNPX.

Authors:  J Hérault; N Iborra; B Serrano; P Chauvel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dosimetric impact of tantalum markers used in the treatment of uveal melanoma with proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Nicholas C Koch; Jonas D Fontenot; Stanley J Rosenthal; Dan S Gombos; Markus M Fitzek; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview.

Authors:  Sunil Krishnan; Laura A Dawson; Jinsil Seong; Yasuyuki Akine; Sam Beddar; Tina M Briere; Christopher H Crane; Francoise Mornex
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Out-of-field dose equivalents delivered by proton therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Wroe; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Monte Carlo simulation of a protontherapy platform devoted to ocular melanoma.

Authors:  J Hérault; N Iborra; B Serrano; P Chauvel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Secondary neutron and photon dose in proton therapy.

Authors:  S Agosteo; C Birattari; M Caravaggio; M Silari; G Tosi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  Secondary neutrons in clinical proton radiotherapy: a charged issue.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Assessment of organ-specific neutron equivalent doses in proton therapy using computational whole-body age-dependent voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Christina Zacharatou Jarlskog; Choonik Lee; Wesley E Bolch; X George Xu; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk of second malignant neoplasm following proton versus intensity-modulated photon radiotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Rebecca M Howell; Sunil Krishnan; Sarah B Scarboro; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Marco Durante
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 60.716

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.