Literature DB >> 18563482

Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

S D Mansfield1, C Jensen, A S Phair, O T Kelly, S B Kelly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loop ileostomies are often formed in order to defunction distal anastomoses. The aim of this study was to review the complications following closure of loop ileostomies.
METHODS: This is a retrospective case note analysis of all loop ileostomy closures performed in the Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust (population over 500,000) over a 5-year period between 2001 and 2005.
RESULTS: A total of 123 case records were reviewed. Complications occurred in 41 patients (33.3%), with 9 patients (7.3%) requiring further intervention. There were 4 (3.3%) postoperative deaths. Complications were more common in patients with increased comorbidity (p = 0.0007) and postoperative death was more frequent among the elderly (p = 0.0006). Postoperative death was more common in those patients who had their stomas created during surgery (elective or emergency) for diverticular disease (3 patients, p = 0.006). Patients with diverticular disease had significantly higher comorbidity and peritoneal contamination at the time of primary surgery. Ileostomy reversal after anterior resection for cancer was associated with a lower complication rate than the rest of the cohort (26%, p = 0.0003) but there was no significant difference in mortality. Neither the grade of the surgeon, the case volume, or the anastomotic technique affected postoperative morbidity. Reoperation was more common in patients whose closure procedure took less time (p = 0.002) and in those who had a shorter wait from creation to reversal of the stoma (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Reversal of loop ileostomy may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Increasing the delay from creation to closure may result in fewer complications.There is an increased risk in older patients with more comorbidity, particularly when the primary procedure is for diverticular disease with significant peritoneal contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18563482     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9669-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown.

Authors:  P T Phang; J M Hain; J J Perez-Ramirez; R D Madoff; B T Gemlo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients.

Authors:  Kutt-Sing Wong; Feza H Remzi; Emre Gorgun; Susana Arrigain; James M Church; Miriam Preen; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Closure of transverse loop colostomy and loop ileostomy.

Authors:  D P Edwards; E M Chisholm; D R Donaldson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy.

Authors:  A W Gooszen; R H Geelkerken; J Hermans; M B Lagaay; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  P Lewis; D C Bartolo
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; S Radley; D G Morton; M R Keighley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Thalheimer; Marco Bueter; Martin Kortuem; Arnulf Thiede; Detlef Meyer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Complications of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  S M Feinberg; R S McLeod; Z Cohen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy.

Authors:  N S Williams; D G Nasmyth; D Jones; A H Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy: a prospective audit.

Authors:  G C O'Toole; J M Hyland; D C Grant; M K Barry
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  35 in total

1.  Loop ileostomy closure: comparison of cost effectiveness between suture and stapler.

Authors:  Karoline Horisberger; Guido Beldi; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Morbidity related to defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection.

Authors:  Oscar Åkesson; Ingvar Syk; Gudrun Lindmark; Pamela Buchwald
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Peritoneo-fascial suture methods for facilitating loop ileostomy mobilization.

Authors:  Samir Johna
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The effect of peri-stomal infiltration with bupivacaine/epinephrine on post-operative pain, nausea and ease of surgery in reversal of loop ileostomies.

Authors:  Kawan Shalli; C Watson; Lynn McCaffer; David Clough; Vimty Muir; Angus Macdonald
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Meta-analysis and single-center experience on the protective effect of negative suction drains on wound healing after stoma reversal.

Authors:  Philipp-Alexander Neumann; Stefan Reischl; Felix Berg; Carsten Jäger; Helmut Friess; Daniel Reim; Güralp O Ceyhan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Nino Gullà; Stefano Trastulli; Carlo Boselli; Roberto Cirocchi; Davide Cavaliere; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia; Umberto Morelli; Daniele Gentile; Emilio Eugeni; Daniela Caracappa; Chiara Listorti; Francesco Sciannameo; Giuseppe Noya
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Zhamak Khorgami; Brian Swendseid; Sadaf Khan; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The Safety of Outpatient Stoma Closure: on the Verge of a Paradigm Shift?

Authors:  James P Taylor; Miloslawa Stem; Sophia Y Chen; David Yu; Sandy H Fang; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.