Literature DB >> 20842360

Loop ileostomy closure: comparison of cost effectiveness between suture and stapler.

Karoline Horisberger1, Guido Beldi, Daniel Candinas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Closure of loop ileostomy can be safely performed using sutures or staplers. The aim of the present study was to compare the cost effectiveness of three different techniques.
METHODS: A total of 128 consecutive patients who underwent closure of loop ileostomy between January 2002 and December 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome parameter was operative cost.
RESULTS: Closure of ileostomy was performed in 66 patients with hand-sewn anastomosis, in 25 patients with stapler only, and in 37 patients with a combination of stapler and suture. There were no differences in terms of early and late postoperative complications. Operative time was significantly longer for "suture only" (101.4 ± 26 min) than for "stapler/suture" (-4.9 min) and "stapler only" (-17.8 min); the difference between the three groups is significant (p = 0.05). Duration of hospital stay was not different among the three groups. Operative costs with "stapler/suture" (1,755.9 ± 355.6 EUR) were significantly higher than with "suture only" (-254 EUR; p = 0.001) and "stapler only" (-236 EUR; p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Operative time using the stapler only is significantly shorter than with hand-sewn anastomosis or combinations of stapler and suture. Operative costs are significantly higher for a procedure that includes suture and stapler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20842360     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0787-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

1.  Bleeding from stapler anastomosis.

Authors:  M G Fischer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Impact of intraoperative behavior on surgical site infections.

Authors:  Guido Beldi; Sonja Bisch-Knaden; Vanessa Banz; Kathrin Mühlemann; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Stapling devices in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  A Tuchmann; K Dinstl; K Strasser; C Armbruster
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1985 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Omission of temporary diversion in restorative proctocolectomy--is it safe?

Authors:  J J Tjandra; V W Fazio; J W Milsom; I C Lavery; J R Oakley; J M Fabre
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; S Radley; D G Morton; M R Keighley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; C Jensen; A S Phair; O T Kelly; S B Kelly
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Complications of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  S M Feinberg; R S McLeod; Z Cohen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study.

Authors:  L A Williams; P M Sagar; P J Finan; D Burke
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Radioresistance-related proteins in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Abdelkarim S Allal; Thilo Kähne; Alexandra K Reverdin; Hans Lippert; Werner Schlegel; Marc-André Reymond
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures.

Authors:  T L Hull; I Kobe; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Thorsten Löffler; Inga Rossion; Käthe Gooßen; Daniel Saure; Jürgen Weitz; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials comparing suture anastomosis to stapled anastomosis for ileostomy closure.

Authors:  M S Sajid; L Craciunas; M K Baig; P Sains
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Early closure of temporary ileostomy--the EASY trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne Kjaergaard Danielsen; Adiela Correa-Marinez; Eva Angenete; Stefan Skullmann; Eva Haglind; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Revisiting stapled and handsewn loop ileostomy closures: a large retrospective series.

Authors:  Emre Balik; Tunc Eren; Dursun Bugra; Yilmaz Buyukuncu; Ali Akyuz; Sumer Yamaner
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey.

Authors:  Bulent Dinc; Nurettin Ay; Huseyin Ciyiltepe
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-19

7.  Bowel stimulation before loop ileostomy closure to reduce postoperative ileus: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Marie Demian; Sarah Sabboobeh; Jeongyoon Moon; Michael Hulme-Moir; A Sender Liberman; Stan Feinberg; Dana M Hayden; Sami A Chadi; Sebastian Demyttenaere; Louise Samuel; Nevart Hotakorzian; Laurence Quintin; Nancy Morin; Julio Faria; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Marylise Boutros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.453

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.