Literature DB >> 20372898

Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor.

Takashi Akiyoshi1, Yoshiya Fujimoto, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Hiroya Kuroyanagi, Masashi Ueno, Masatoshi Oya, Toshiharu Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loop ileostomy is customary after very low rectal anastomosis to reduce the rate of pelvic sepsis that can result from anastomotic leakage. To evaluate complications of stoma closure is important to maximize the benefit of making the defunctioning stoma. The aim of this study was to examine possible risk factors associated with complications, especially wound infections, after loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor.
METHODS: Data from 125 consecutive patients who underwent an elective closure of loop ileostomy after primary rectal tumor resection from January 2005 and October 2009 at a single institution were prospectively collected. Nineteen independent clinical variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Postoperative complications developed in 21 (16.8%) patients, including 20 (16%) wound infections, 1 (0.8%) ileus, and 1 (0.8%) anastomotic bleeding. There was no postoperative mortality. Risk factors for wound infection included male gender (odds ratio = 5.30; 95% confidence interval 1.14-24.8; p = 0.0339) and surgical site infection (SSI) after primary surgery (odds ratio = 5.00; 95% confidence interval 1.24-20.1; p = 0.0234). Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with complications than in patients without them (14.0 versus 11.0 days; p = 0.0078).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that most complications associated with ileostomy closure in a homogeneous group of patients with rectal tumor were wound infections. Male gender and SSI after primary surgery were independent risk factors for the development of wound infections. Surgeons should be aware of such high-risk patients, and techniques other than primary closure might need to be considered in high-risk patients to reduce wound infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20372898     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0547-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  20 in total

1.  National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques.

Authors:  G Lahat; H Tulchinsky; G Goldman; J M Klauzner; M Rabau
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Loop ileostomy morbidity: timing of closure matters.

Authors:  Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Angelita Habr-Gama; Victor E Seid; Igor Proscurshim; Afonso H Sousa; Desidério R Kiss; Marcelo Linhares; Manuela Sapucahy; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment.

Authors:  K P Riesener; W Lehnen; M Höfer; R Kasperk; J C Braun; V Schumpelick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Subcutaneous gentamycin implant to reduce wound infections after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  O Haase; W Raue; B Böhm; H Neuss; M Scharfenberg; W Schwenk
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; C Jensen; A S Phair; O T Kelly; S B Kelly
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norbert Hüser; Christoph W Michalski; Mert Erkan; Tibor Schuster; Robert Rosenberg; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors.

Authors:  D J Hackam; O D Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  17 in total

1.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Risk factors for complications after diverting ileostomy closure in patients who have undergone rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Takatoshi Nakamura; Takeo Sato; Masanori Naito; Takahiro Yamanashi; Hirohisa Miura; Atsuko Tsutsui; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  A comparative study of patients with and without associated digestive surgery in a two-stage hepatectomy setting.

Authors:  Mattia Stella; Aurélien Dupre; Sylvie Chabaud; Alessandro Gandini; Pierre Meeus; Patrice Peyrat; Michel Rivoire
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  The Effectiveness of Contralateral Drainage in Reducing Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Loop Ileostomy Closure: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anna Serracant; Xavier Serra-Aracil; Laura Mora-López; Anna Pallisera-Lloveras; Sheila Serra-Pla; Alba Zárate-Pinedo; Salvador Navarro-Soto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Subcutaneous vacuum drains reduce surgical site infection after primary closure of defunctioning ileostomy.

Authors:  Hong-Da Pan; Lin Wang; Yi-Fan Peng; Ming Li; Yun-Feng Yao; Jun Zhao; Tian-Cheng Zhan; Chang-Zheng Du; Jin Gu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.

Authors:  J C Lauscher; V Schneider; L D Lee; A Stroux; H J Buhr; M E Kreis; J P Ritz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Gender differences in risk of bloodstream and surgical site infections.

Authors:  Bevin Cohen; Yoon Jeong Choi; Sandra Hyman; E Yoko Furuya; Matthew Neidell; Elaine Larson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Morbidities after closure of ileostomy: analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Vivian Chi Mei Man; Hok Kwok Choi; Wai Lun Law; Dominic Chi Chung Foo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Radiation-induced distal ileal obstruction complicating ileostomy closure.

Authors:  Z Zakaria; D Toomey; J Deasy
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Conventional Linear versus Purse-string Skin Closure after Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Comparison of Wound Infection Rates and Operative Outcomes.

Authors:  Jung Ryeol Lee; Young Wan Kim; Jong Je Sung; Ok-Pyung Song; Hyung Chul Kim; Cheol-Wan Lim; Gyu-Seok Cho; Jun Chul Jung; Eung-Jin Shin
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.