Literature DB >> 24281432

Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal.

Deborah S Keller1, Zhamak Khorgami, Brian Swendseid, Sadaf Khan, Conor P Delaney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unplanned readmissions after colorectal surgery impact patient and financial outcomes. Our goal was to identify factors related to readmission in ostomy reversal patients.
METHODS: Review of a prospective department database was performed from 2006 to 2012 to identify patients who underwent an ostomy reversal. Patients were stratified into nonreadmitted and readmitted within 30 days of ostomy reversal. The main outcome measures were predictors of readmission and characteristics of patients readmitted and not readmitted.
RESULTS: A total of 351 ostomy reversals (86 % ileostomy and 14 % colostomy) were analyzed; 44 patients were readmitted (12.5 %). Readmitted and nonreadmitted patients were similar in age, body mass index, gender, comorbidities, indications for the index operation, and time to ostomy reversal. Readmitted patients had longer operative times (p = 0.002) and length of stay (p = 0.001), more intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.003), intraoperative complications (p = 0.005), ICU requirements (p < 0.0001), need for temporary nursing at discharge (p < 0.001), and higher total hospital costs than nonreadmitted patients (p = 0.0162). Longer operative time [odds ratio (OR) 1.006, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.001-1.012], intraoperative complications (OR 7.334, 95 % CI 1.23-43.761), ICU stay (OR 1.291, 95 % CI 1.18-1.893), delayed discharge (OR 1.085, 95 % CI 1.003-1.173), and discharge to skilled nursing facility (OR 6.936, 95 % CI 1.531-31.332) were independent predictors of readmission. Ostomy type had no independent effect on readmission.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in perioperative and outcomes variables exist between readmitted and nonreadmitted patients after ostomy reversal. Longer operative times, intraoperative complications, intensive care unit care, longer length of stay, and skilled nursing at discharge were independently predictive of readmission. These findings can be used to identify high-risk patients prospectively, potentially improving clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24281432     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3320-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Patient readmission and mortality after colorectal surgery for colon cancer: impact of length of stay relative to other clinical factors.

Authors:  Eric B Schneider; Omar Hyder; Benjamin S Brooke; Jonathan Efron; John L Cameron; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Renal impairment caused by temporary loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Nicole Beck-Kaltenbach; Katja Voigt; Bernhard Rumstadt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients.

Authors:  Kutt-Sing Wong; Feza H Remzi; Emre Gorgun; Susana Arrigain; James M Church; Miriam Preen; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Risk factors of unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  D Guinier; G A Mantion; A Alves; F Kwiatkowski; K Slim; Y Panis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation.

Authors:  Evangelos Messaris; Rishabh Sehgal; Susan Deiling; Walter A Koltun; David Stewart; Kevin McKenna; Lisa S Poritz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  E Rullier; N Le Toux; C Laurent; J L Garrelon; M Parneix; J Saric
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; C Jensen; A S Phair; O T Kelly; S B Kelly
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long?

Authors:  W Baraza; J Wild; W Barber; S Brown
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay and readmission after colorectal resection: a population-based study of elective and emergency admissions.

Authors:  Maria Kelly; Linda Sharp; Fiona Dwane; Tracy Kelleher; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  THE VULKAN TECHNIQUE: A NOVEL OSTOMY-CLOSURE TECHNIQUE THAT REDUCES COMPLICATIONS AND OPERATIVE TIMES.

Authors:  Felix Krenzien; Christian Benzing; Fabian Harders; Tido Junghans; Gyurdhan Rasim; Claudia Bothe; Johann Pratschke; Ricardo Zorron
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

2.  Impact of high- versus low-dose neuromuscular blocking agent administration on unplanned 30-day readmission rates in retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Martijn Boon; Chris Martini; H Keri Yang; Shuvayu S Sen; Rob Bevers; Michiel Warlé; Leon Aarts; Marieke Niesters; Albert Dahan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  COLOSTOMY CLOSURE: RISK FACTORS FOR COMPLICATIONS.

Authors:  Alexandre Z Fonseca; Edson Uramoto; Otto M Santos-Rosa; Stephanie Santin; Marcelo Ribeiro
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

4.  Predictors of complications from stoma closure in elective colorectal surgery: an assessment from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACSNSQIP).

Authors:  T R de Paula; S Nemeth; R P Kiran; D S Keller
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.781

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.