PURPOSE: Evidence to support the routine use of local anaesthetic in the reversal of loop ileostomy is equivocal. This randomized control study looked at the use of peri-operative infiltration of stoma with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine on the ease of surgery and its effect on post-operative pain and nausea. METHODS:Sixty patients were randomized to receive peri-stomal infiltration with either 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine or normal saline. The surgeon graded the surgery as straightforward, intermediate or difficult, and the time for the operation was also recorded. Post-operatively, analgesia was provided via PCA for 24 h. Post-operative pain and nausea scores and total morphine usage median (inter-quartile range) were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: There was no difference between the local anaesthetic groups and controls with respect to opiate consumption (p = 0.4), post-operative pain (p = 0.72) or nausea (p = 0.78). Shorter total anaesthetic and operative times were noted in study group, but this was not significant (p = 0.55). However, surgery was found to be easier in the local anaesthetic group (p = 0.0046). CONCLUSION: Peri-stomal infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine does not impact on post-operative pain and nausea scores or opiate analgesia use. However, its use is recommended as an aid to dissection in surgery.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Evidence to support the routine use of local anaesthetic in the reversal of loop ileostomy is equivocal. This randomized control study looked at the use of peri-operative infiltration of stoma with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine on the ease of surgery and its effect on post-operative pain and nausea. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized to receive peri-stomal infiltration with either 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine or normal saline. The surgeon graded the surgery as straightforward, intermediate or difficult, and the time for the operation was also recorded. Post-operatively, analgesia was provided via PCA for 24 h. Post-operative pain and nausea scores and total morphine usage median (inter-quartile range) were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: There was no difference between the local anaesthetic groups and controls with respect to opiate consumption (p = 0.4), post-operative pain (p = 0.72) or nausea (p = 0.78). Shorter total anaesthetic and operative times were noted in study group, but this was not significant (p = 0.55). However, surgery was found to be easier in the local anaesthetic group (p = 0.0046). CONCLUSION: Peri-stomal infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine does not impact on post-operative pain and nausea scores or opiate analgesia use. However, its use is recommended as an aid to dissection in surgery.
Authors: A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 6.113