Literature DB >> 9579124

Closure of transverse loop colostomy and loop ileostomy.

D P Edwards1, E M Chisholm, D R Donaldson.   

Abstract

The aim of a defunctioning stoma is to protect patients from the consequences of faecal leakage and pelvic sepsis, should it occur. A retrospective audit of 77 patients who had undergone closure of a loop stoma between 1988 and 1996 was performed. Sixty patients had either transverse loop colostomy (52) or loop ileostomy (8) to defunction distal colorectal/anal anastomoses or pathology, and 17 patients had a loop ileostomy to defunction an ileoanal pouch. Those who had restorative proctocolectomy experienced a much higher (24%) complication rate than the loop colostomy group (5%), despite similar perioperative care and surgery performed by surgeons of equivalent seniority. The complication rate of ileostomy closure in pouch patients is similar to other published series. As a result of these findings, a selective approach to the use of loop ileostomy to protect pouches has been introduced. The absence of wound infections in our series would suggest that primary closure of the stomal wound without drainage can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9579124      PMCID: PMC2502753     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  13 in total

1.  Randomized trial of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  S P Grobler; K B Hosie; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis.

Authors:  N D Karanjia; A P Corder; P J Holdsworth; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Temporary loop ileostomy following restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  K B Hosie; S P Grobler; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Protective colostomy closure: the hazards of a "minor" operation.

Authors:  D F Altomare; O C Pannarale; L Lupo; N Palasciano; V Memeo; M Rubino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Results of closure of loop transverse colostomies.

Authors:  J P Thomson; P R Hawley
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-08-19

6.  Factors influencing the safety of colostomy closure in the elderly.

Authors:  R W Wong; W D Rappaport; D B Witzke; C W Putnam; G C Hunter
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases.

Authors:  H D van de Pavoordt; V W Fazio; D G Jagelman; I C Lavery; F L Weakley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  P Lewis; D C Bartolo
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  The Biethium bridge--an advance in stoma care.

Authors:  L R Jenkinson; P W Houghton; K V Steele; L A Donaldson; M K Crumplin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors.

Authors:  D J Hackam; O D Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  10 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hong Zhi Geng; Dilidan Nasier; Bing Liu; Hua Gao; Yi Ke Xu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure.

Authors:  Aneel Bhangu; Dmitri Nepogodiev; Kaori Futaba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Reversal of loop ileostomy under spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Richard John England; Clare Blues; Shwan Niazi Amin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-10-30       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Small-bowel obstruction after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Hanna Aberg; Lars Påhlman; Urban Karlbom
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; C Jensen; A S Phair; O T Kelly; S B Kelly
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  [Oncologic surgical procedures in ambulatory and brief inpatient surgery].

Authors:  J Fahlke; F Eder; M Pross; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Simon P Bach; Neil J Mortensen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications.

Authors:  Kheng-Seong Ng; Simon Joseph Gonsalves; Peter Michael Sagar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.