Literature DB >> 30350192

The Safety of Outpatient Stoma Closure: on the Verge of a Paradigm Shift?

James P Taylor1, Miloslawa Stem1, Sophia Y Chen1, David Yu1,2, Sandy H Fang1, Susan L Gearhart1, Bashar Safar1, Jonathan E Efron3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An area of contention among colorectal surgeons is when it is safe to discharge patients who have undergone closure of diverting ostomies. This study aimed to review the trends in outpatient stoma closure (OSC), to assess the safety of this practice, and to identify appropriate surgical candidates for the outpatient procedure.
METHODS: Patients were queried from the ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2016). Main outcomes included Clavien-Dindo (C-D) III-V class surgical complications, and readmission. Outpatient stay was defined as a hospital stay of less than or equal to 1 day. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for C-D III-V complications and readmission.
RESULTS: Of 24,393 patients, 668 (2.74%) underwent an OSC. OSC has increased over the last decade (3.16% 2005-2006, 4.14% 2016, p < 0.001). Outpatients had significantly lower ASA class and fewer comorbidities than inpatients. Outpatient complication rate was significantly lower than the inpatient rate (2.99% vs. 7.25%, p < 0.001). Readmissions were comparable (8.92% outpatient vs. 9.77% inpatient, p = 0.54). ASA > 2, smoking, COPD, dyspnea, steroid use, bleeding disorder, and partial/total dependency were associated with increased risk of complications and readmission. Patients without any risk factors had lower complication (4.75%) and readmission rates (8.09%) compared to those with ≥ 2 risk factors (11.50% complication and 13.07% readmission rate, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing trend in the percentage of stoma closures being performed as outpatient procedures. Appropriate selection of patients preoperatively who are suitable candidates for OSC can be helpful in managing patient expectations and hospital resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elective; Ileostomy; Reversal; Stoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30350192     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-4001-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  28 in total

1.  Not a social event: the follow-up phone call.

Authors:  S Barnes
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.084

2.  Morbidity and mortality after the closure of a protective loop ileostomy: analysis of possible predictors.

Authors:  Gokhan Cipe; Bulent Erkek; Ayhan Kuzu; Ethem Gecim
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012-10

3.  Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is?

Authors:  William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  [Outpatient surgery: an unstoppable evolution].

Authors:  P Charbonnet; V Ott; E Schiffer; T Berney; P Morel
Journal:  Rev Med Suisse       Date:  2010-06-23

5.  Using Modified Frailty Index to Predict Safe Discharge Within 48 Hours of Ileostomy Closure.

Authors:  Yuxiang Wen; Murad A Jabir; Eslam M G Dosokey; Dongjin Choi; Clayton C Petro; Justin T Brady; Scott R Steele; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Loop ileostomy closure at an ambulatory surgery facility: a safe and cost-effective alternative to routine hospitalization.

Authors:  Matthew F Kalady; Ryan C Fields; Stephen Klein; Karen C Nielsen; Christopher R Mantyh; Kirk A Ludwig; Karen C Nielson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kathleen A Armstrong; Peter C Coyte; Mitchell Brown; Brett Beber; John L Semple
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after urologic surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; Rodney L Dunn; Aruna V Sarma; Darrell A Campbell; John T Wei
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia consensus statement on preoperative selection of adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea scheduled for ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Girish P Joshi; Saravanan P Ankichetty; Tong J Gan; Frances Chung
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  The treatment of breast cancer in one day surgery. A four year experience.

Authors:  Andrea Tirone; Manuela Cesaretti; Giuseppe Vuolo; Ilaria Gaggelli; Alfredo Guarnieri; Alessandro Piccolomini; Luigi Verre; Vinno Savelli; Fabrizio Varrone; Pasquale D'Onofrio; Caterina Di Bella; Antonio Ferdinando Carli
Journal:  Ann Ital Chir       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.766

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Short-stay compared to long-stay admissions for loop ileostomy reversals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Archer; Zacharie Cloutier; Annie Berg; Tyler McKechnie; Wojtek Wiercioch; Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Same day discharge following elective, minimally invasive, colorectal surgery : A review of enhanced recovery protocols and early outcomes by the SAGES Colorectal Surgical Committee with recommendations regarding patient selection, remote monitoring, and successful implementation.

Authors:  Elisabeth C McLemore; Lawrence Lee; Traci L Hedrick; Laila Rashidi; Erik P Askenasy; Daniel Popowich; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.