Literature DB >> 19221766

The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Andre Chow1, Henry S Tilney, Paraskevas Paraskeva, Santhini Jeyarajah, Emmanouil Zacharakis, Sanjay Purkayastha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Loop ileostomies are used currently in surgical practice to reduce the consequences of distal anastomotic failure following colorectal resection. It is often assumed that reversal of a loop ileostomy is a simple and safe procedure. However, many studies have demonstrated high morbidity rates following loop ileostomy closure. The aims of this systematic review were to examine all the existing evidence in the literature on morbidity and mortality following closure of loop ileostomy.
METHOD: A literature search of Ovid, Embase, the Cochrane database, Google Scholar and Medline using Pubmed as the search engine was used to identify studies reporting on the morbidity of loop ileostomy closure (latest at June 15th 2008), was performed. Outcomes of interest included demographics, the details regarding the original indication for operation, operative and hospital-related outcomes, post-operative bowel-related complications, and other surgical and medical complications.
RESULTS: Forty-eight studies from 18 countries satisfied the inclusion criteria. Outcomes of a total of 6,107 patients were analysed. Overall morbidity following closure of loop ileostomy was found to be 17.3% with a mortality rate of 0.4%. 3.7% of patients required a laparotomy at the time of ileostomy closure. The most common post-operative complications included small bowel obstruction (7.2%) and wound sepsis (5.0%).
CONCLUSION: The consequences of anastomotic leakage following colorectal resection are severe. However, the consequences of stoma reversal are often underestimated. Surgeons should adopt a selective strategy regarding the use of defunctioning ileostomy, and counsel patients further prior to the original surgery. In this way, patients at low risk may be spared the morbidity of stoma reversal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221766     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0660-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  84 in total

1.  Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown.

Authors:  P T Phang; J M Hain; J J Perez-Ramirez; R D Madoff; B T Gemlo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; C A Marijnen; I D Nagtegaal; H Putter; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; L Pahlman; B Glimelius; J H van Krieken; J W Leer; C J van de Velde
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996.

Authors:  M Kairaluoma; H Rissanen; V Kultti; J-P Mecklin; I Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum.

Authors:  O Hallböök; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy.

Authors:  A W Gooszen; R H Geelkerken; J Hermans; M B Lagaay; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Y Sakai; H Nelson; D Larson; L Maidl; T Young-Fadok; D Ilstrup
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-03

7.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  W I Law; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  The morbidity of defunctioning stomata.

Authors:  F Chen; M Stuart
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1996-04

9.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Subcutaneous gentamycin implant to reduce wound infections after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  O Haase; W Raue; B Böhm; H Neuss; M Scharfenberg; W Schwenk
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  110 in total

1.  Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?

Authors:  Art Hiranyakas; Assar Rather; Giovanna da Silva; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Is there an Advantage to a Minimally Invasive Approach?

Authors:  Monica T Young; Grace S Hwang; Gopal Menon; Timothy F Feldmann; Mehraneh D Jafari; Fariba Jafari; Eden Perez; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Anne F Peery; Nicholas J Shaheen; Katherine S Cools; Todd H Baron; Mark Koruda; Joseph A Galanko; Ian S Grimm
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Morbidity related to defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection.

Authors:  Oscar Åkesson; Ingvar Syk; Gudrun Lindmark; Pamela Buchwald
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Chyme Reinfusion Is Associated with Lower Rate of Postoperative Ileus in Crohn's Disease Patients After Stoma Closure.

Authors:  Ming Duan; Lei Cao; Lei Gao; Jianfeng Gong; Yi Li; Weiming Zhu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Koichi Tamura; Kenji Matsuda; Shozo Yokoyama; Hiromitsu Iwamoto; Yuki Mizumoto; Daisuke Murakami; Yuki Nakamura; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Andrew Kennedy-Dalby; Sheik Rehman; Reza Arsalani Zadeh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity.

Authors:  Y A Shelygin; S V Chernyshov; E G Rybakov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  The Safety of Outpatient Stoma Closure: on the Verge of a Paradigm Shift?

Authors:  James P Taylor; Miloslawa Stem; Sophia Y Chen; David Yu; Sandy H Fang; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.