Literature DB >> 9915235

Defunctioning loop ileostomy: a prospective audit.

G C O'Toole1, J M Hyland, D C Grant, M K Barry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Defunctioning loop ileostomies are uncommonly used forms of fecal diversion. The aim of this study was to determine the morbidity associated with both construction and reversal of loop ileostomies. STUDY
DESIGN: An analysis was performed of all patients who underwent loop ileostomy construction or reversal between 1990 and 1997, with data being collected prospectively.
RESULTS: One-hundred-two patients, (43 male, 59 female) with a mean age of 38 years (range 13 to 81 years) had loop ileostomies constructed. Indications for ileostomy construction included inflammatory bowel disease (76 patients), ultralow anterior resection for carcinoma (16 patients), or miscellaneous reasons (10 patients). Nine patients (9%) had complications arising from ileostomy construction including 4 parastomal infections, 3 high output ileostomies, 1 small-bowel obstruction, and 1 ileostomy stenosis in the early postoperative period. Only the stricture required surgical intervention. All other complications improved with conservative management. Mean time to ileostomy reversal was 120 days. Three patients (4%) had complications associated with reversal. All of these complications required surgical intervention, 2 for small bowel obstruction, and 1 for small bowel perforation. Currently 84 patients have had their ileostomy reversed, and 12 patients have had their loop ileostomy converted to a permanent stoma for reasons not related to the loop ileostomy itself.
CONCLUSIONS: Defunctioning loop ileostomy is associated with low morbidity. We recommend a defunctioning ileostomy as the procedure of choice for temporary fecal diversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9915235     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00267-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  17 in total

Review 1.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Early stomal complications.

Authors:  Brian R Kann
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

3.  Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Nino Gullà; Stefano Trastulli; Carlo Boselli; Roberto Cirocchi; Davide Cavaliere; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia; Umberto Morelli; Daniele Gentile; Emilio Eugeni; Daniela Caracappa; Chiara Listorti; Francesco Sciannameo; Giuseppe Noya
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Facilitated early ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery: a case-matched study.

Authors:  S Memon; A G Heriot; C E Atkin; A C Lynch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity.

Authors:  S N Amin; M A Memon; N C Armitage; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Rod in loop ileostomy: just an insignificant detail for ileostomy-related complications?

Authors:  Marco Scarpa; Laura Sadocchi; Cesare Ruffolo; Maurizio Iacobone; Teresa Filosa; Daniela Prando; Lino Polese; Mauro Frego; Davide F D'Amico; Imerio Angriman
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity.

Authors:  Y A Shelygin; S V Chernyshov; E G Rybakov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; C Jensen; A S Phair; O T Kelly; S B Kelly
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Morbidity of ostomy takedown.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Shlomo Israelit; Daniel Klaristenfeld; Paul Selvindoss; Petar Vukasin; Glenn Ault; Robert W Beart
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Early Closure of Defunctioning Loop Ileostomy: Is It Beneficial for the Patient? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Menahem; Jean Lubrano; Antoine Vallois; Arnaud Alves
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.