Literature DB >> 18491545

Development of a QA phantom and automated analysis tool for geometric quality assurance of on-board MV and kV x-ray imaging systems.

Weihua Mao1, Louis Lee, Lei Xing.   

Abstract

The medical linear accelerator (linac) integrated with a kilovoltage (kV) flat-panel imager has been emerging as an important piece of equipment for image-guided radiation therapy. Due to the sagging of the linac head and the flexing of the robotic arms that mount the x-ray tube and flat-panel detector, geometric nonidealities generally exist in the imaging geometry no matter whether it is for the two-dimensional projection image or three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography. Normally, the geometric parameters are established during the commissioning and incorporated in correction software in respective image formation or reconstruction. A prudent use of an on-board imaging system necessitates a routine surveillance of the geometric accuracy of the system like the position of the x-ray source, imager position and orientation, isocenter, rotation trajectory, and source-to-imager distance. Here we describe a purposely built phantom and a data analysis software for monitoring these important parameters of the system in an efficient and automated way. The developed tool works equally well for the megavoltage (MV) electronic portal imaging device and hence allows us to measure the coincidence of the isocenters of the MV and kV beams of the linac. This QA tool can detect an angular uncertainty of 0.1 degrees of the x-ray source. For spatial uncertainties, such as the source position, the imager position, or the kV/MV isocenter misalignment, the demonstrated accuracy of this tool was better than 1.6 mm. The developed tool provides us with a simple, robust, and objective way to probe and monitor the geometric status of an imaging system in a fully automatic process and facilitate routine QA workflow in a clinic.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491545      PMCID: PMC2811556          DOI: 10.1118/1.2885719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction using a C-arm mounted XRII: image-based correction of gantry motion nonidealities.

Authors:  R Fahrig; D W Holdsworth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Incorporating prior knowledge into beam orientation optimization in IMRT.

Authors:  Andrei Pugachev; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Optimisation of conformal radiotherapy dose distributions by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Webb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems.

Authors:  Youngbin Cho; Douglas J Moseley; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; David A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  CT image registration in sinogram space.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Tianfang Li; Nicole Wink; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Verification of radiosurgery target point alignment with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).

Authors:  L Dong; A Shiu; S Tung; A Boyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Comparison of simulated annealing algorithms for conformal therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  I I Rosen; K S Lam; R G Lane; M Langer; S M Morrill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Geometrical calibration of X-ray imaging chains for three-dimensional reconstruction.

Authors:  A Rougée; C Picard; C Ponchut; Y Trousset
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1993 Jul-Oct       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; L Coia; M Gillin; W F Hanson; S Leibel; R J Morton; J R Palta; J A Purdy; L E Reinstein; G K Svensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  16 in total

1.  The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Louis Lee; Weihua Mao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An EPID based method for performing high accuracy calibration between an optical external marker tracking device and the LINAC reference frame.

Authors:  Zachary Grelewicz; Hyejoo Kang; Rodney D Wiersma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy.

Authors:  J Chetley Ford; Dandan Zheng; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Long-term stability and mechanical characteristics of kV digital imaging system for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mingyao Zhu; Thomas Botticello; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Brian Winey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Automating quality assurance of digital linear accelerators using a radioluminescent phosphor coated phantom and optical imaging.

Authors:  Cesare H Jenkins; Dominik J Naczynski; Shu-Jung S Yu; Yong Yang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Set-up error validation with EPID images: Measurements vs Egs_cbct simulation.

Authors:  D van Eeden; F H J O'Reilly; F C P du Plessis
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-10-21

7.  A quality assurance procedure to evaluate cone-beam CT image center congruence with the radiation isocenter of a linear accelerator.

Authors:  Weiliang Du; James N Yang; Eric L Chang; Dershan Luo; Mary Frances McAleer; Almon Shiu; Mary K Martel
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Imaging system QA of a medical accelerator, Novalis Tx, for IGRT per TG 142: our 1 year experience.

Authors:  Zheng Chang; James Bowsher; Jing Cai; Sua Yoo; Zhiheng Wang; Justus Adamson; Lei Ren; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Implementation and evaluation of an end-to-end IGRT test.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Jimmy Jones; Nathan L Childress
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Evaluation of IsoCal geometric calibration system for Varian linacs equipped with on-board imager and electronic portal imaging device imaging systems.

Authors:  Song Gao; Weiliang Du; Peter Balter; Peter Munro; Andrew Jeung
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.