Literature DB >> 22559649

An EPID based method for performing high accuracy calibration between an optical external marker tracking device and the LINAC reference frame.

Zachary Grelewicz1, Hyejoo Kang, Rodney D Wiersma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the increasing use of external 3D optical tracking cameras to guide modern radiation therapy procedures, it has become vitally important to have an accurate camera to linear accelerator (LINAC) reference frame calibration. To eliminate errors present in current calibration procedures based on the manual hand alignment of a device using the light field crosshairs and in room guidance lasers, a semiautomated quantitative calibration approach requiring only use of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was developed.
METHODS: A phantom comprised of seven highly IR reflective plastic BBs was placed on the LINAC treatment couch and imaged with both a 3D stereoscopic IR imager and the on board megavoltage (MV) EPID imager. Having knowledge of the optically determined 3D positions and projected EPID images of the BBs, simulated annealing was used to optimize the location of the BBs in the LINAC frame using four different optimization functions. Singular value decomposition was then used to calculate the transformation matrix between the camera and LINAC reference frames. Results were then compared to a traditional camera calibration method for overall accuracy.
RESULTS: Using modeled data, the simulated annealing process was able to determine the actual locations of the BBs with a RMSE of 0.23 mm. Using projection images acquired with an MV imager, the process was able to determine locations of BBs within .26 mm. The results depend on the choice of optimization function.
CONCLUSIONS: Results show that the method can be used to provide highly accurate spatial registration between an external 3D imaging reference frame and the LINAC frame. The experimental MV imager results, while not as precise as the simulated results, exceed 1 mm accuracy and the current accepted AAPM TG-142 standard of ≤2 mm positioning accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559649      PMCID: PMC3350542          DOI: 10.1118/1.3703836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  A procedure to determine the radiation isocenter size in a linear accelerator.

Authors:  A González; I Castro; J A Martínez
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Targeting accuracy of an image guided gating system for stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Stephen E Tenn; Timothy D Solberg; Paul M Medin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Optimization by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Kirkpatrick; C D Gelatt; M P Vecchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Development of a QA phantom and automated analysis tool for geometric quality assurance of on-board MV and kV x-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Louis Lee; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Use of the BrainLAB ExacTrac X-Ray 6D system in image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jian-Yue Jin; Fang-Fang Yin; Stephen E Tenn; Paul M Medin; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 1.482

6.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Linear accelerator as a neurosurgical tool for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  K R Winston; W Lutz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  The University of Florida frameless high-precision stereotactic radiotherapy system.

Authors:  F J Bova; J M Buatti; W A Friedman; W M Mendenhall; C C Yang; C Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Gig S Mageras; James M Balter; Richard S Emery; Kenneth M Forster; Steve B Jiang; Jeffrey M Kapatoes; Daniel A Low; Martin J Murphy; Brad R Murray; Chester R Ramsey; Marcel B Van Herk; S Sastry Vedam; John W Wong; Ellen Yorke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Development of a frameless stereotactic radiosurgery system based on real-time 6D position monitoring and adaptive head motion compensation.

Authors:  Rodney D Wiersma; Zhifei Wen; Meredith Sadinski; Karl Farrey; Kamil M Yenice
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  4 in total

1.  Robotic real-time translational and rotational head motion correction during frameless stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Xinmin Liu; Andrew H Belcher; Zachary Grelewicz; Rodney D Wiersma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Towards frameless maskless SRS through real-time 6DoF robotic motion compensation.

Authors:  Andrew H Belcher; Xinmin Liu; Steven Chmura; Kamil Yenice; Rodney D Wiersma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Spatial and rotational quality assurance of 6DOF patient tracking systems.

Authors:  Andrew H Belcher; Xinmin Liu; Zachary Grelewicz; Rodney D Wiersma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Development of a 6DOF robotic motion phantom for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Andrew H Belcher; Xinmin Liu; Zachary Grelewicz; Erik Pearson; Rodney D Wiersma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.