Literature DB >> 27514654

Automating quality assurance of digital linear accelerators using a radioluminescent phosphor coated phantom and optical imaging.

Cesare H Jenkins1, Dominik J Naczynski, Shu-Jung S Yu, Yong Yang, Lei Xing.   

Abstract

Performing mechanical and geometric quality assurance (QA) tests for medical linear accelerators (LINAC) is a predominantly manual process that consumes significant time and resources. In order to alleviate this burden this study proposes a novel strategy to automate the process of performing these tests. The autonomous QA system consists of three parts: (1) a customized phantom coated with radioluminescent material; (2) an optical imaging system capable of visualizing the incidence of the radiation beam, light field or lasers on the phantom; and (3) software to process the captured signals. The radioluminescent phantom, which enables visualization of the radiation beam on the same surface as the light field and lasers, is placed on the couch and imaged while a predefined treatment plan is delivered from the LINAC. The captured images are then processed to self-calibrate the system and perform measurements for evaluating light field/radiation coincidence, jaw position indicators, cross-hair centering, treatment couch position indicators and localizing laser alignment. System accuracy is probed by intentionally introducing errors and by comparing with current clinical methods. The accuracy of self-calibration is evaluated by examining measurement repeatability under fixed and variable phantom setups. The integrated system was able to automatically collect, analyze and report the results for the mechanical alignment tests specified by TG-142. The average difference between introduced and measured errors was 0.13 mm. The system was shown to be consistent with current techniques. Measurement variability increased slightly from 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm when the phantom setup was varied, but no significant difference in the mean measurement value was detected. Total measurement time was less than 10 minutes for all tests as a result of automation. The system's unique features of a phosphor-coated phantom and fully automated, operator independent self-calibration offer the potential to streamline the QA process for modern LINACs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27514654      PMCID: PMC5233459          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/17/L29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  New methods for optical distance indicator and gantry angle quality control tests in medical linear accelerators: image processing by using a 3D phantom.

Authors:  Mahdi Heravian Shandiz; Ghorban Safaeian Layen; Kazem Anvari; Mohammadmahdi Khalilzadeh
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-03-31

2.  Development of a QA phantom and automated analysis tool for geometric quality assurance of on-board MV and kV x-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Louis Lee; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Monitoring external beam radiotherapy using real-time beam visualization.

Authors:  Cesare H Jenkins; Dominik J Naczynski; Shu-Jung S Yu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Automated x-ray/light field congruence using the LINAC EPID panel.

Authors:  Wojciech Polak; Jim O'Doherty; Matt Jones
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A simple quality assurance test tool for the visual verification of light and radiation field congruent using electronic portal images device and computed radiography.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh; Blas Caroprese; Pushkar Desai
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  A survey of the practice and management of radiotherapy linear accelerator quality control in the UK.

Authors:  A Palmer; J Kearton; O Hayman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Quality and safety considerations in stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy: Executive summary.

Authors:  Timothy D Solberg; James M Balter; Stanley H Benedict; Benedick A Fraass; Brian Kavanagh; Curtis Miyamoto; Todd Pawlicki; Louis Potters; Yoshiya Yamada
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-15

9.  An EPID-based method for comprehensive verification of gantry, EPID and the MLC carriage positional accuracy in Varian linacs during arc treatments.

Authors:  Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Conor K McGarry; Michael P Barnes; Mahsheed Sabet; Martin A Ebert
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Automated quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Eduard Schreibmann; Eric Elder; Tim Fox
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Deep learning-augmented radiotherapy visualization with a cylindrical radioluminescence system.

Authors:  Mengyu Jia; Xiaomeng Li; Yan Wu; Yong Yang; Priya Kasimbeg; Lawrie Skinner; Lei Wang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Assessing the robustness of artificial intelligence powered planning tools in radiotherapy clinical settings-a phantom simulation approach.

Authors:  Martin Hito; Wentao Wang; Hunter Stephens; Yibo Xie; Ruilin Li; Fang-Fang Yin; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Qiuwen Wu; Yang Sheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-12

3.  Factor 10 Expedience of Monthly Linac Quality Assurance via an Ion Chamber Array and Automation Scripts.

Authors:  Lawrie B Skinner; Yong Yang; Annie Hsu; Lei Xing; Amy S Yu; Thomas Niedermayr
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

Review 4.  [Digitalization of healthcare and its effects on quality of care].

Authors:  Jan Benedikt Brönneke; Jörg Felix Debatin
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.513

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.