Literature DB >> 18434523

High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Chris Sekirnjak1, Pawel Hottowy, Alexander Sher, Wladyslaw Dabrowski, Alan M Litke, E J Chichilnisky.   

Abstract

The development of retinal implants for the blind depends crucially on understanding how neurons in the retina respond to electrical stimulation. This study used multielectrode arrays to stimulate ganglion cells in the peripheral macaque retina, which is very similar to the human retina. Analysis was restricted to parasol cells, which form one of the major high-resolution visual pathways in primates. Individual cells were characterized using visual stimuli, and subsequently targeted for electrical stimulation using electrodes 9-15 microm in diameter. Results were accumulated across 16 ON and 9 OFF parasol cells. At threshold, all cells responded to biphasic electrical pulses 0.05-0.1 ms in duration by firing a single spike with latency lower than 0.35 ms. The average threshold charge density was 0.050 +/- 0.005 mC/cm(2), significantly below established safety limits for platinum electrodes. ON and OFF ganglion cells were stimulated with similar efficacy. Repetitive stimulation elicited spikes within a 0.1 ms time window, indicating that the high temporal precision necessary for spike-by-spike stimulation can be achieved in primate retina. Spatial analysis of observed thresholds suggests that electrical activation occurred near the axon hillock, and that dendrites contributed little. Finally, stimulation of a single parasol cell produced little or no activation of other cells in the ON and OFF parasol cell mosaics. The low-threshold, temporally precise, and spatially specific responses hold promise for the application of high-density arrays of small electrodes in epiretinal implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18434523      PMCID: PMC2681084          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5138-07.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  45 in total

Review 1.  Will retinal implants restore vision?

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The interpretation of spike potentials of motoneurones.

Authors:  J S COOMBS; D R CURTIS; J C ECCLES
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-12-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Suprathreshold excitation of frog tectal neurons by short spike trains of single retinal ganglion cell.

Authors:  Antanas Kuras; Armantas Baginskas; Vaida Batuleviciene
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Electrical stimulation of isolated retina with microwire glass electrodes.

Authors:  Lee Johnson; F Keith Perkins; Thomas O'Hearn; Perry Skeath; Charles Merritt; Joseph Frieble; Srinivas Sadda; Mark Humayun; Dean Scribner
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 5.  Learning retina implants with epiretinal contacts.

Authors:  R Eckmiller
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  S I Fried; H A Hsueh; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: II-estimation of maximum surface redox (theoretical non-gassing) limits.

Authors:  S B Brummer; M J Turner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Long-term stimulation by active epiretinal implants in normal and RCD1 dogs.

Authors:  Dilek Güven; James D Weiland; Gildo Fujii; Brian V Mech; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Robert Greenberg; Roberto Roizenblatt; Guanting Qiu; Laurie Labree; Xiaopeng Wang; David Hinton; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Visual resolution with epi-retinal electrical stimulation estimated from activation profiles in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  Marcus Wilms; Marcus Eger; Thomas Schanze; Reinhard Eckhorn
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo; Ofer R Ziv; Andrew Grumet; John Wyatt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  75 in total

1.  Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size.

Authors:  Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Robert J Greenberg; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Shelley I Fried; Aaron C W Lasker; Neal J Desai; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Response variability to high rates of electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Changsi Cai; Qiushi Ren; Neal J Desai; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Influence of the sodium channel band on retinal ganglion cell excitation during electric stimulation--a modeling study.

Authors:  P Werginz; S I Fried; F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Changsi Cai; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Focal electrical stimulation of major ganglion cell types in the primate retina for the design of visual prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.