Literature DB >> 15262070

Electrical stimulation of isolated retina with microwire glass electrodes.

Lee Johnson1, F Keith Perkins, Thomas O'Hearn, Perry Skeath, Charles Merritt, Joseph Frieble, Srinivas Sadda, Mark Humayun, Dean Scribner.   

Abstract

The development of high-resolution retinal prostheses fabricated from silicon wafers presents an interesting problem: how to electrically bridge the space between the flat silicon wafer and the curved retinal surface. One potential "bridge" is a microwire glass electrode. In this paper we present our results in evaluating microwire glass electrodes. We stimulated isolated rabbit retina (n = 5) with a 0.0256 cm(2) microwire electrode. The current and pulse duration were varied from 498 to 1660 microA and 0.1 to 3 ms, respectively. We found that short pulses produced more spikes per coulomb and longer pulses produced more spikes per milliamp. The optimal pulse duration range of 0.7-1 ms was identified as a compromise between the advantages of short and long pulses. Stimulation of isolated rabbit retina with microwire glass results in consistent neuronal spike formation at safe charge density, 20.7 +/- 4.3 microC/cm(2). We also examined the response of retinas (n = 6) to stimulation with a smaller microwire electrode, 0.0002 cm(2). We found that less current was required (15 microA versus 756 microA) for a 1 ms pulse, but at the expense of greater charge density (75 microC/cm(2) versus 29.5 microC/cm(2)). Nonetheless, a 128-fold reduction in area resulted in only a 2.7-fold increase in charge density required for a 1 ms pulse duration. The results presented here indicate that microwire glass can be used as a neural stimulating electrode to bridge the gap between flat microelectronic stimulator chips and curved neuronal tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15262070     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  3 in total

1.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Simultaneous recording of mouse retinal ganglion cells during epiretinal or subretinal stimulation.

Authors:  S L Sim; R J Szalewski; L J Johnson; L E Akah; L E Shoemaker; W B Thoreson; E Margalit
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Implantation and Extraction of Penetrating Electrode Arrays in Minipig Retinas.

Authors:  Jinghua Chen; Vasiliki Poulaki; Seong-Joon Kim; William D Eldred; Sheryl Kane; Marcus Gingerich; Douglas B Shire; Ralph Jensen; Gloria DeWalt; Henry J Kaplan; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.283

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.