Literature DB >> 14977333

Visual resolution with epi-retinal electrical stimulation estimated from activation profiles in cat visual cortex.

Marcus Wilms1, Marcus Eger, Thomas Schanze, Reinhard Eckhorn.   

Abstract

Blinds with receptor degeneration can perceive localized phosphenes in response to focal electrical epi-retinal stimuli. To avoid extensive basic stimulation tests in human patients, we developed techniques for estimating visual spatial resolution in anesthetized cats. Electrical epi-retinal and visual stimulation was combined with multiple-site retinal and cortical microelectrode recordings of local field potentials (LFPs) from visual areas 17 and 18. Classical visual receptive fields were characterized for retinal and cortical recording sites using multifocal visual stimulation combined with stimulus-response cross-correlation. We estimated visual spatial resolution from the size of the cortical activation profiles in response to single focal stimuli. For comparison, we determined activation profiles in response to visual stimuli at the same retinal location. Activation profiles were single peaked or multipeaked. In multipeaked profiles, the peak locations coincided with discontinuities in cortical retinotopy. Location and width of cortical activation profiles were distinct for retinal stimulation sites. On average, the activation profiles had a size of 1.28 +/- 0.03 mm cortex. Projected to visual space this corresponds to a spatial resolution of 1.49 deg +/- 0.04 deg visual angle. Best resolutions were 0.5 deg at low and medium stimulation currents corresponding to a visus of 1/30. Higher stimulation currents caused lower spatial, but higher temporal resolution (up to 70 stimuli/s). In analogy to the receptive-field concept in visual space, we defined and characterized electrical receptive fields. As our estimates of visual resolutions are conservative, we assume that a visual prosthesis will induce phosphenes at least at this resolution. This would enable visuomotor coordinations and object recognition in many indoor and outdoor situations of daily life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14977333     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523803205083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  8 in total

Review 1.  Getting signals into the brain: visual prosthetics through thalamic microstimulation.

Authors:  John S Pezaris; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatial characteristics of evoked potentials elicited by a MEMS microelectrode array for suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in a rabbit.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Xiaohong Sui; Wenjia Liu; Yiliang Lu; Pengjia Cao; Zengguang Ma; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

5.  Simulations of electrode placement for a thalamic visual prosthesis.

Authors:  John S Pezaris; R Clay Reid
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Response of Mouse Visual Cortical Neurons to Electric Stimulation of the Retina.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats.

Authors:  Marcus Wilms; Reinhard Eckhorn
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Probing the functional impact of sub-retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Sébastien Roux; Frédéric Matonti; Florent Dupont; Louis Hoffart; Sylvain Takerkart; Serge Picaud; Pascale Pham; Frédéric Chavane
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.