Literature DB >> 22110084

Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Devyani Nanduri1, Ione Fine, Alan Horsager, Geoffrey M Boynton, Mark S Humayun, Robert J Greenberg, James D Weiland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In an effort to restore functional form vision, epiretinal prostheses that elicit percepts by directly stimulating remaining retinal circuitry were implanted in human subjects with advanced retinitis pigmentosa RP). In this study, manipulating pulse train frequency and amplitude had different effects on the size and brightness of phosphene appearance.
METHODS: Experiments were performed on a single subject with severe RP (implanted with a 16-channel epiretinal prosthesis in 2004) on nine individual electrodes. Psychophysical techniques were used to measure both the brightness and size of phosphenes when the biphasic pulse train was varied by either modulating the current amplitude (with constant frequency) or the stimulating frequency (with constant current amplitude).
RESULTS: Increasing stimulation frequency always increased brightness, while having a smaller effect on the size of elicited phosphenes. In contrast, increasing stimulation amplitude generally increased both the size and brightness of phosphenes. These experimental findings can be explained by using a simple computational model based on previous psychophysical work and the expected spatial spread of current from a disc electrode.
CONCLUSIONS: Given that amplitude and frequency have separable effects on percept size, these findings suggest that frequency modulation improves the encoding of a wide range of brightness levels without a loss of spatial resolution. Future retinal prosthesis designs could benefit from having the flexibility to manipulate pulse train amplitude and frequency independently (clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00279500).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22110084      PMCID: PMC3292357          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  51 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal diversity in the retina.

Authors:  R H Masland
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  S I Fried; H A Hsueh; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Characterization of retinal ganglion cell activities evoked by temporally patterned electrical stimulation for the development of stimulus encoding strategies for retinal implants.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Jang Hee Ye; Jong Seung Lee; Yong Sook Goo; Kyung Hwan Kim
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The extent of the region of occipital cortex that when stimulated gives phosphenes fixed in the visual field.

Authors:  G S Brindley; P E Donaldson; M A Falconer; D N Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The visual sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the medial occipital cortex.

Authors:  G S Brindley; W S Lewin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  X and Y ganglion cells inform the cat's brain about contrast in the retinal image.

Authors:  J B Troy; C Enroth-Cugell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Scott H Greenwald; James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Robert E Marc; Bryan W Jones; Carl B Watt; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  46 in total

1.  The effect of waveform asymmetry on perception with epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Kathleen E Finn; V Swetha E Jeganathan; Uday Patel; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Arup Roy; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  Pulse trains to percepts: the challenge of creating a perceptually intelligible world with sight recovery technologies.

Authors:  Ione Fine; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Punita Christopher; Jianing Wei; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Uday Patel; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Activation of ganglion cells and axon bundles using epiretinal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Lauren E Grosberg; Karthik Ganesan; Georges A Goetz; Sasidhar S Madugula; Nandita Bhaskhar; Victoria Fan; Peter Li; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; Subhasish Mitra; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Stimulation strategies for selective activation of retinal ganglion cell soma and threshold reduction.

Authors:  Yao-Chuan Chang; Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Spatially patterned electrical stimulation to enhance resolution of retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Paweł Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Władysław Dąbrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Georges Goetz; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Photovoltaic Restoration of Central Vision in Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Daniel Palanker; Yannick Le Mer; Saddek Mohand-Said; Mahiul Muqit; Jose A Sahel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Patch clamp recordings of retinal bipolar cells in response to extracellular electrical stimulation in wholemount mouse retina.

Authors:  Steven T Walston; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.