Literature DB >> 15876657

Long-term stimulation by active epiretinal implants in normal and RCD1 dogs.

Dilek Güven1, James D Weiland, Gildo Fujii, Brian V Mech, Manjunatha Mahadevappa, Robert Greenberg, Roberto Roizenblatt, Guanting Qiu, Laurie Labree, Xiaopeng Wang, David Hinton, Mark S Humayun.   

Abstract

An epiretinal prosthesis, consisting of an extraocular microelectronic stimulator and an intraocular electrode array, was implanted in one eye of three blind and three sighted dogs. Three dogs (2 blind, 1 normal) were stimulated for 120 days, and two dogs (both normal) for 60 and 103 days respectively for 8-10 h/day at levels of 0.1 mC cm(-2) and 0.05 mC cm(-2), with each stimulus level presented to half of the array. One blind dog was kept as an inactive implant control. During the study period, electroretinograms (ERG) and fundus photographs were recorded. At the end of the study period, the dogs were sacrificed and histological and morphometric evaluation was made of the retina. No inflammatory reaction, neovascularization or hemorrhage was observed during the follow-up examinations. ERGs were unchanged. Stimulus levels used were of sufficient amplitude to elicit cortical evoked potentials. Histological evaluation showed no inflammatory infiltrates or changes in retina morphometry related to electrical stimulation when compared to the unstimulated control eye. Morphometric analysis revealed no consistent differences relating to electrical stimulation. In summary, chronic electrical stimulation of the dog retina at up to 0.1 mC cm(-2) with an epiretinal prosthesis does not appear to adversely affect the retina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15876657     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/1/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  16 in total

Review 1.  A review of in vivo animal studies in retinal prosthesis research.

Authors:  Dimiter R Bertschinger; Evgueny Beknazar; Manuel Simonutti; Avinoam B Safran; José A Sahel; Serge G Rosolen; Serge Picaud; Joel Salzmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  [Development of a minimally invasive retinal implant system].

Authors:  H Gerding
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Development of surgical techniques for implantation of a wireless intraocular epiretinal retina implant in Göttingen minipigs.

Authors:  Thomas Laube; Claudia Brockmann; Gernot Roessler; Peter Walter; Christine Krueger; Michael Goertz; Susanne Klauke; Norbert Bornfeld
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The primate model for understanding and restoring vision.

Authors:  Serge Picaud; Deniz Dalkara; Katia Marazova; Olivier Goureau; Botond Roska; José-Alain Sahel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Neural responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the retina.

Authors:  Shih-Jen Chen; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Roberto Roizenblatt; James Weiland; Mark Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

Review 8.  The use of canine models of inherited retinal degeneration to test novel therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  William A Beltran
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.644

9.  Immunocytochemical analysis of retinal neurons under electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Aditi Ray; Leonardo Colodetti; James D Weiland; David R Hinton; Mark S Humayun; Eun-Jin Lee
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Characterization of a canine model of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa due to a PDE6A mutation.

Authors:  Nalinee Tuntivanich; Steven J Pittler; Andy J Fischer; Ghezal Omar; Matti Kiupel; Arthur Weber; Suxia Yao; Juan Pedro Steibel; Naheed Wali Khan; Simon M Petersen-Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.