Literature DB >> 24560986

Influence of the sodium channel band on retinal ganglion cell excitation during electric stimulation--a modeling study.

P Werginz1, S I Fried2, F Rattay3.   

Abstract

Electric stimulation using retinal implants allows blind people to re-experience a rudimentary kind of vision. The elicited percepts or so called 'phosphenes' are highly inconstant and therefore do not restore vision properly. The better knowledge of how retinal neurons, especially retinal ganglion cells, respond to electric stimulation will help to develop more sophisticated stimulation strategies. Special anatomic and physiologic properties like a band of highly dense sodium channels in retinal ganglion cells may help to achieve a focal activation of target cells and as a result better restoration of vision. A portion of retinal ganglion cell axons, about 40μm from the soma and between 25 and 40μm in length, shows a specific biophysical property. Electrode locations close to a band of highly dense sodium channels which were identified immunochemically show lowest thresholds during electric stimulation. The (modeled) thresholds for this kind of structure result in lowest thresholds as well. The influence on the location where action potentials are generated within the axon is far reaching. When a stimulating electrode is positioned far outside the actual band region the site of spike initiation still remains within the sodium channel band. These findings suggest to further examine the key mechanisms of activation for retinal ganglion cells because focal activation without influencing passing axons of neurons located far away can improve the outcome of electric stimulation and therefore the development of retinal implants.
Copyright © 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activating function; compartment model; external electric stimulation; retinal implant; sodium channel band; spike initiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24560986      PMCID: PMC4423397          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  37 in total

1.  Polarized distribution of ion channels within microdomains of the axon initial segment.

Authors:  Audra Van Wart; James S Trimmer; Gary Matthews
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Distinct contributions of Na(v)1.6 and Na(v)1.2 in action potential initiation and backpropagation.

Authors:  Wenqin Hu; Cuiping Tian; Tun Li; Mingpo Yang; Han Hou; Yousheng Shu
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Response variability to high rates of electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Changsi Cai; Qiushi Ren; Neal J Desai; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporal properties of visual perception on electrical stimulation of the retina.

Authors:  Angélica Pérez Fornos; Jörg Sommerhalder; Lyndon da Cruz; Jose Alain Sahel; Saddek Mohand-Said; Farhad Hafezi; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  The sodium channel band shapes the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  J Jeng; S Tang; A Molnar; N J Desai; S I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Which elements of the mammalian central nervous system are excited by low current stimulation with microelectrodes?

Authors:  F Rattay; C Wenger
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Simulation of epiretinal prostheses - evaluation of geometrical factors affecting stimulation thresholds.

Authors:  Harsha Kasi; Willyan Hasenkamp; Gregoire Cosendai; Arnaud Bertsch; Philippe Renaud
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  13 in total

1.  Morphological Factors that Underlie Neural Sensitivity to Stimulation in the Retina.

Authors:  Vineeth Raghuram; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried; Brian P Timko
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2021-09-01

2.  Micro-Coil Design Influences the Spatial Extent of Responses to Intracortical Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Krishnan Thyagarajan; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  A Patient-Specific Computational Framework for the Argus II Implant.

Authors:  Kathleen E Finn; Hans J Zander; Robert D Graham; Scott F Lempka; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-11

4.  Selective Activation of Cortical Columns Using Multichannel Magnetic Stimulation With a Bent Flat Microwire Array.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.756

5.  Minimizing activation of overlying axons with epiretinal stimulation: The role of fiber orientation and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Timothy B Esler; Robert R Kerr; Bahman Tahayori; David B Grayden; Hamish Meffin; Anthony N Burkitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  High-Resolution Multi-Scale Computational Model for Non-Invasive Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Dennis Q Truong; Devin K Adair; Bruce J Simon; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-10-27

7.  On the upper threshold phenomenon of extracellular neural stimulation.

Authors:  Frank Rattay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The relationship between morphological properties and thresholds to extracellular electric stimulation in α RGCs.

Authors:  Paul Werginz; Vineeth Raghuram; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Somatic inhibition by microscopic magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hui Ye; Lauryn Barrett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Impact of Electrode Position on the Elicitation of Sodium Spikes in Retinal Bipolar Cells.

Authors:  Frank Rattay; Hassan Bassereh; Andreas Fellner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.