Literature DB >> 18383663

Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.

D P Chakraborty1, Hong-Jun Yoon.   

Abstract

In 1996 Swensson published an observer model that predicted receiver operating characteristic (ROC), localization ROC (LROC), free-response ROC (FROC) and alternative FROC (AFROC) curves, thereby achieving "unification" of different observer performance paradigms. More recently a model termed initial detection and candidate analysis (IDCA) has been proposed for fitting computer aided detection (CAD) generated FROC data, and recently a search model for human observer FROC data has been proposed. The purpose of this study was to derive IDCA and the search model based expressions for operating characteristics, and to compare the predictions to the Swensson model. For three out of four mammography CAD data sets all models yielded good fits in the high-confidence region, i.e., near the lower end of the plots. The search model and IDCA tended to better fit the data in the low-confidence region, i.e., near the upper end of the plots, particularly for FROC curves for which the Swensson model predictions departed markedly from the data. For one data set none of the models yielded satisfactory fits. A unique characteristic of search model and IDCA predicted operating characteristics is that the operating point is not allowed to move continuously to the lowest confidence limit of the corresponding Swensson model curves. This prediction is actually observed in the CAD raw data and it is the primary reason for the poor FROC fits of the Swensson model in the low-confidence region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IDCA; LROC model; lesion localization; operating characteristics; search model

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18383663      PMCID: PMC2288570          DOI: 10.1118/1.2820902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part I. Some interesting examples of binormal degeneracy.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; E A Brandser
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Visual detection and localization of radiographic images.

Authors:  S J Starr; C E Metz; L B Lusted; D J Goodenough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Small nodule detectability evaluation using a generalized scan-statistic model.

Authors:  Lucreţiu M Popescu; Robert M Lewitt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A visual concept shapes image perception.

Authors:  H L Kundel; C F Nodine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms.

Authors:  Hong Jun Yoon; Bin Zheng; Berkman Sahiner; Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  8 in total

1.  Model for the detection of signals in images with multiple suspicious locations.

Authors:  Lucreţiu M Popescu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory observer performance paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; T M Haygood; J Ryan; E M Marom; M Evanoff; M F McEntee; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Stephen L Hillis; Filip Claus; Chantal Van Ongeval; Valerie Celis; Veerle Provoost; Hong-Jun Yoon; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Recent developments in imaging system assessment methodology, FROC analysis and the search model.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 5.  New developments in observer performance methodology in medical imaging.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  Clinical relevance of the ROC and free-response paradigms for comparing imaging system efficacies.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Scott Mayer McKinney; Marcin Sieniek; Varun Godbole; Jonathan Godwin; Natasha Antropova; Hutan Ashrafian; Trevor Back; Mary Chesus; Greg S Corrado; Ara Darzi; Mozziyar Etemadi; Florencia Garcia-Vicente; Fiona J Gilbert; Mark Halling-Brown; Demis Hassabis; Sunny Jansen; Alan Karthikesalingam; Christopher J Kelly; Dominic King; Joseph R Ledsam; David Melnick; Hormuz Mostofi; Lily Peng; Joshua Jay Reicher; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Richard Sidebottom; Mustafa Suleyman; Daniel Tse; Kenneth C Young; Jeffrey De Fauw; Shravya Shetty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.