Literature DB >> 17654906

Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms.

Hong Jun Yoon1, Bin Zheng, Berkman Sahiner, Dev P Chakraborty.   

Abstract

Computer-aided detection (CAD) has been attracting extensive research interest during the last two decades. It is recognized that the full potential of CAD can only be realized by improving the performance and robustness of CAD algorithms and this requires good evaluation methodology that would permit CAD designers to optimize their algorithms. Free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curves are widely used to assess CAD performance, however, evaluation rarely proceeds beyond determination of lesion localization fraction (sensitivity) at an arbitrarily selected value of nonlesion localizations (false marks) per image. This work describes a FROC curve fitting procedure that uses a recent model of visual search that serves as a framework for the free-response task. A maximum likelihood procedure for estimating the parameters of the model from free-response data and fitting CAD generated FROC curves was implemented. Procedures were implemented to estimate two figures of merit and associated statistics such as 95% confidence intervals and goodness of fit. One of the figures of merit does not require the arbitrary specification of an operating point at which to evaluate CAD performance. For comparison a related method termed initial detection and candidate analysis was also implemented that is applicable when all suspicious regions are reported. The two methods were tested on seven mammography CAD data sets and both yielded good to excellent fits. The search model approach has the advantage that it can potentially be applied to radiologist generated free-response data where not all suspicious regions are reported, only the ones that are deemed sufficiently suspicious to warrant clinical follow-up. This work represents the first practical application of the search model to an important evaluation problem in diagnostic radiology. Software based on this work is expected to benefit CAD developers working in diverse areas of medical imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17654906      PMCID: PMC2041901          DOI: 10.1118/1.2736289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  43 in total

1.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems.

Authors:  Hans Bornefalk; Anna Bornefalk Hermansson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; Gordon S Abrams; Amy H Lu; Luisa P Wallace; Glenn S Maitz; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A visual concept shapes image perception.

Authors:  H L Kundel; C F Nodine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Mónica Penedo; Miguel Souto; Pablo G Tahoces; José M Carreira; Justo Villalón; Gerardo Porto; Carmen Seoane; Juan J Vidal; Kevin S Berbaum; Dev P Chakraborty; Laurie L Fajardo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs.

Authors:  J R Muhm; W E Miller; R S Fontana; D R Sanderson; M A Uhlenhopp
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Samuel G Armato; Alberto Bert; Loredana Correale; Silvia Delsanto; Matthew T Freedman; David Fryd; David Gur; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Zhimin Huo; Yulei Jiang; Lia Morra; Sophie Paquerault; Vikas Raykar; Frank Samuelson; Ronald M Summers; Georgia Tourassi; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Bin Zheng; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A software framework for building biomedical machine learning classifiers through grid computing resources.

Authors:  Raúl Ramos-Pollán; Miguel Angel Guevara-López; Eugénio Oliveira
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Discovering mammography-based machine learning classifiers for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Raúl Ramos-Pollán; Miguel Angel Guevara-López; Cesar Suárez-Ortega; Guillermo Díaz-Herrero; Jose Miguel Franco-Valiente; Manuel Rubio-Del-Solar; Naimy González-de-Posada; Mario Augusto Pires Vaz; Joana Loureiro; Isabel Ramos
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Mammographic image denoising and enhancement using the Anscombe transformation, adaptive wiener filtering, and the modulation transfer function.

Authors:  Larissa C S Romualdo; Marcelo A C Vieira; Homero Schiabel; Nelson D A Mascarenhas; Lucas R Borges
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Improving the performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Lihua Li; Weidong Xu; Wei Liu; Dror Lederman; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Xingwei Wang; Dror Lederman; Jun Tan; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Application of threshold-bias independent analysis to eye-tracking and FROC data.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Performance assessments of diagnostic systems under the FROC paradigm: experimental, analytical, and results interpretation issues.

Authors:  David Gur; Howard E Rockette
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Sang Cheol Park; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.