Literature DB >> 18309572

Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Grace L Nimmons1, Robert S Kang, Ward R Drennan, Jeff Longnion, Chad Ruffin, Tina Worman, Bevan Yueh, Jay T Rubenstien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants (CI) have provided tremendous benefit for speech recognition in quiet for patients with severe and profound hearing impairment, but implant users still have great difficulty perceiving music. The purpose of this study was to develop a test to quantify music perception by CI listeners in a clinically practical manner that could be standardized for administration at any implant center. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective convenience sample.
SETTING: Hearing research center at an academic hospital. PATIENTS: Eight CI listeners, including 5 men and 3 women with implant experience ranging from 0.5 to 6 years, participated in this study. They represented a variety of implant devices and strategies. INTERVENTION: Administration of the Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test in a standardized sound field. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Music perception was assessed using a computerized test comprising pitch direction discrimination, melody identification, and timbre identification. The pitch subtest used a 2-alternative forced-choice adaptive procedure to determine a threshold interval for discrimination of complex pitch direction change. The melody and timbre subtests assessed recognition of 12 isochronous melodies and 8 musical instruments, respectively.
RESULTS: Testing demonstrated a broad range of perceptual accuracy on all 3 subtests. Test duration averaged less than 45 minutes.
CONCLUSION: Clinical Assessment of Music Perception is an efficient computerized test that may be used to measure 3 different aspects of music perception in CI users in a standardized and clinically practical manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18309572      PMCID: PMC2669784          DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31812f7244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Shelley Witt; George Woodworth; Maureen A Mehr; John Knutson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters; Marc Moonen
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Vasant K Dasika; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27

7.  Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; C R Lansing
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

8.  Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  K Gfeller; J F Knutson; G Woodworth; S Witt; B DeBus
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; G Woodworth; D A Robin; S Witt; J F Knutson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more
  39 in total

1.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.

Authors:  Rose Wright; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Melody recognition in dichotic listening with or without frequency-place mismatch.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

6.  Vocal singing by prelingually-deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Li Xu; Ning Zhou; Xiuwu Chen; Yongxin Li; Heather M Schultz; Xiaoyan Zhao; Demin Han
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joseph Heng; Gabriela Cantarero; Mounya Elhilali; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users.

Authors:  Birgit Philips; Bart Vinck; Eddy De Vel; Leen Maes; Wendy D'Haenens; Hannah Keppler; Ingeborg Dhooge
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Hybrid Music Perception Outcomes: Implications for Melody and Timbre Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Aaron J Parkinson; Jay T Rubinstein; Ward R Drennan; Christa Dodson; Kaibao Nie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Leonid M Litvak; Michael F Dorman; Ashley R Bohanan; Lakshmi N Mishra
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.