Literature DB >> 9493937

Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults.

K Gfeller1, J F Knutson, G Woodworth, S Witt, B DeBus.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the appraisal and recognition of timbre (four different musical instruments) by recipients of Clarion cochlear implants (CIS strategy, 75- or 150-microsec pulse widths) and to compare their performance with that of normal-hearing listeners. Twenty-eight Clarion cochlear implant users and 41 normal-hearing listeners were asked to give a subjective assessment of the pleasantness of each instrument using a visual analog scale with anchors of "like very much" to "dislike very much," and to match each sound with a picture of the instrument they believed had produced it. No significant differences were found between the two different pulse widths for either appreciation or recognition; thus, data from the two pulse widths following 12 months of Clarion implant use were collapsed for further analyses. Significant differences in appraisal were found between normal-hearing listeners and implant recipients for two of the four instruments sampled. Normal-hearing adults were able to recognize all of the instruments with significantly greater accuracy than implant recipients. Performance on timbre perception tasks was correlated with speech perception and cognitive tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9493937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  26 in total

1.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Jacob Oleson; John F Knutson; Patrick Breheny; Virginia Driscoll; Carol Olszewski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Music Therapy for Preschool Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Maura Kenworthy; Tanya Van Voorst
Journal:  Music Ther Perspect       Date:  2011-06

4.  Vocal singing by prelingually-deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Li Xu; Ning Zhou; Xiuwu Chen; Yongxin Li; Heather M Schultz; Xiaoyan Zhao; Demin Han
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; Carol Olszewski; John F Knutson; Christopher Turner; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  J Music Ther       Date:  2012

6.  The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.

Authors:  Kristin M Sjoberg; Virginia D Driscoll; Kate Gfeller; Anne E Welhaven; Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-01-18

7.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

8.  Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; John F Knutson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 9.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

10.  Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Virginia D Driscoll; Jacob Oleson; Dingfeng Jiang; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.