Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

Literature DB >> 14714781

Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

Li Xu, Bryan E Pfingst.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2003 PMID： 14714781 PMCID： PMC1283139 DOI： 10.1121/1.1623786

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Acoust Soc Am ISSN： 0001-4966 Impact factor: 1.840

× No keyword cloud information.

18 in total

1. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors: Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal: Nature Date: 2002-03-07 Impact factor: 49.962

2. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors: L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 1.840

3. On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception.

Authors: O Ghitza
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 1.840

4. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal.

Authors: Kate Gfeller; Shelley Witt; George Woodworth; Maureen A Mehr; John Knutson
Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 1.547

5. Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors: Fan Gang Zeng
Journal: Hear Res Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.208

6. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

Authors: Li Xu; Yuhjung Tsai; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 1.840

7. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors: B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal: Nature Date: 1991-07-18 Impact factor: 49.962

8. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors: D D Greenwood
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 1.840

9. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects.

Authors: B Townshend; N Cotter; D Van Compernolle; R L White
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 1987-07 Impact factor: 1.840

10. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

Authors: R V Shannon
Journal: Hear Res Date: 1983-08 Impact factor: 3.208

42 in total

1. Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

Authors: Robert V Shannon; Rachel J Cruz; John J Galvin
Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2010-07-17 Impact factor: 1.854

2. Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors: Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2011-08-11

10. Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.

Authors: Daniel Fogerty
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 1.840

Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

1. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

2. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

3. On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception.

4. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal.

5. Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

6. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

7. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

8. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

9. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects.

10. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

1. Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

2. Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

3. Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

4. Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses.

5. Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

6. Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.

7. Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

8. Lexical tone recognition with an artificial neural network.

9. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.

10. Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.