Literature DB >> 21664263

Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.

Joseph Heng1, Gabriela Cantarero, Mounya Elhilali, Charles J Limb.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users demonstrate severe limitations in perceiving musical timbre, a psychoacoustic feature of sound responsible for 'tone color' and one's ability to identify a musical instrument. The reasons for this limitation remain poorly understood. In this study, we sought to examine the relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure for timbre judgments, in light of the fact that speech processing strategies employed by CI systems typically employ envelope extraction algorithms. We synthesized "instrumental chimeras" that systematically combined variable amounts of envelope and fine structure in 25% increments from two different source instruments with either sustained or percussive envelopes. CI users and normal hearing (NH) subjects were presented with 150 chimeras and asked to determine which instrument the chimera more closely resembled in a single-interval two-alternative forced choice task. By combining instruments with similar and dissimilar envelopes, we controlled the valence of envelope for timbre identification and compensated for envelope reconstruction from fine structure information. Our results show that NH subjects utilize envelope and fine structure interchangeably, whereas CI subjects demonstrate overwhelming reliance on temporal envelope. When chimeras were created from dissimilar envelope instrument pairs, NH subjects utilized a combination of envelope (p = 0.008) and fine structure information (p = 0.009) to make timbre judgments. In contrast, CI users utilized envelope information almost exclusively to make timbre judgments (p < 0.001) and ignored fine structure information (p = 0.908). Interestingly, when the value of envelope as a cue was reduced, both NH subjects and CI users utilized fine structure information to make timbre judgments (p < 0.001), although the effect was quite weak in CI users. Our findings confirm that impairments in fine structure processing underlie poor perception of musical timbre in CI users.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21664263      PMCID: PMC3343076          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  34 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Alain de Cheveigné; Stephen McAdams; Suzanne Winsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal properties in clear speech perception.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Multidimensional scaling of synthetic musical timbre: perception of spectral and temporal characteristics.

Authors:  S Samson; R J Zatorre; J O Ramsay
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1997-12

7.  Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data.

Authors:  C N Jolly; F A Spelman; B M Clopton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres.

Authors:  J M Grey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Sheryl R Erenberg; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-09
View more
  13 in total

1.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

2.  Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Naomi B H Croghan; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Reliability measure of a clinical test: Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI).

Authors:  Min-Yu Cheng; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Dean Mancuso
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Damien Bonnard; Adam Schwalje; Bruce Gantz; Inyong Choi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Accuracy and cue use in word segmentation for cochlear-implant listeners and normal-hearing listeners presented vocoded speech.

Authors:  Christopher C Heffner; Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Temporal fine structure influences voicing confusions for consonant identification in multi-talker babble.

Authors:  Vibha Viswanathan; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Temporal feature perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Deepashri Agrawal; Filipa C Viola; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Residual neural processing of musical sound features in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Peter Vuust; Elvira Brattico; Deepashri Agrawal; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; John J Galvin; Bert Maat; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Temporal and spectral contributions to musical instrument identification and discrimination among cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sandra M Prentiss; David R Friedland; Tanner Fullmer; Alison Crane; Timothy Stoddard; Christina L Runge
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.