Literature DB >> 20635091

Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Walter Di Nardo1, Alessandro Scorpecci, Sara Giannantonio, Francesca Cianfrone, Gaetano Paludetti.   

Abstract

Recent research has shown that music perception remains very difficult for most cochlear implant (CI) users, who generally report being unsatisfied with the quality of music listening through the CI. In particular, the appreciation of the spectral features of music, which include pitch, melody and timbre, is widely known to be poorer than its rhythmic patterns. One of the possible causes for this may be the misalignment between the conventional frequency band allocation to the electrodes of the array (frequency-place function) and the distribution of pitch percepts generated by electrode stimulation along the array (electrode-pitch function). In this paper the authors investigate whether mismatch correction through individualized fitting of the processor's frequency maps can improve music understanding in ten Nucleus™ cochlear implant users, by comparing scores obtained with experimental and old map; both maps were tested before, immediately after and 1 month after the fitting through a music test battery designed for the purpose of the study.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20635091     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1335-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  44 in total

1.  Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music.

Authors:  S Fujita; J Ito
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.

Authors:  Uwe Baumann; Andrea Nobbe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

5.  The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Hugh McDermott; Colette McKay; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Varieties of musical disorders. The Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz; Annie Sophie Champod; Krista Hyde
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Adaptation to distorted frequency-to-place maps: implications of simulations in normal listeners for cochlear implants and electroacoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Andrew Faulkner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  11 in total

1.  Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours.

Authors:  Frank Michael Digeser; Anne Hast; Thomas Wesarg; Horst Hessel; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly.

Authors:  W Di Nardo; R Anzivino; S Giannantonio; L Schinaia; G Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.

Authors:  Mohammad Alfelasi; Jean Pierre Piron; Caroline Mathiolon; Nadjmah Lenel; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel; Frederic Venail
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A physiological and behavioral system for hearing restoration with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Julia King; Ina Shehu; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of implantable hearing aids and neuroprosthesison music perception.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Lars Böhme; Gerrit Götze
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-03

6.  Design and evaluation of a cochlear implant strategy based on a "Phantom" channel.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; Aniket A Saoji; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An automated A-value measurement tool for accurate cochlear duct length estimation.

Authors:  John E Iyaniwura; Mai Elfarnawany; Hanif M Ladak; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-22

8.  The Effectiveness of Targeted Electrical Stimulation via Cochlear Implant on Tinnitus-Perceived Loudness.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Tiziana Di Cesare; Angelo Tizio; Gaetano Paludetti; Anna Rita Fetoni
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.152

9.  Infant hearing loss: from diagnosis to therapy Official Report of XXI Conference of Italian Society of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.

Authors:  G Paludetti; G Conti; W DI Nardo; E DE Corso; R Rolesi; P M Picciotti; A R Fetoni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Musical training software for children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  W Di Nardo; L Schinaia; R Anzivino; E De Corso; A Ciacciarelli; G Paludetti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.