Literature DB >> 22533978

Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.

Rose Wright1, Rosalie M Uchanski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The inability to hear music well may contribute to decreased quality of life for cochlear implant (CI) users. Researchers have reported recently on the generally poor ability of CI users to perceive music, and a few researchers have reported on the enjoyment of music by CI users. However, the relation between music perception skills and music enjoyment is much less explored. Only one study has attempted to predict CI users' enjoyment and perception of music from the users' demographic variables and other perceptual skills (Gfeller et al, 2008). Gfeller's results yielded different predictive relationships for music perception and music enjoyment, and the relationships were weak, at best.
PURPOSE: The first goal of this study is to clarify the nature and relationship between music perception skills and musical enjoyment for CI users, by employing a battery of music tests. The second goal is to determine whether normal hearing (NH) subjects, listening with a CI simulation, can be used as a model to represent actual CI users for either music enjoyment ratings or music perception tasks. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A prospective, cross-sectional observational study. Original music stimuli (unprocessed) were presented to CI users, and music stimuli processed with CI-simulation software were presented to 20 NH listeners (CIsim). As a control, original music stimuli were also presented to five other NH listeners. All listeners appraised 24 musical excerpts, performed music perception tests, and filled out a musical background questionnaire. Music perception tests were the Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI), Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA), Melodic Contour Identification (MCI), and University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception (UW-CAMP). STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-five NH adults (22-56 yr old), recruited from the local and research communities, participated in the study. Ten adult CI users (46-80 yr old), recruited from the patient population of the local adult cochlear implant program, also participated in this study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Musical excerpts were appraised using a seven-point rating scale, and music perception tests were scored as designed. Analysis of variance was performed on appraisal ratings, perception scores, and questionnaire data with listener group as a factor. Correlations were computed between musical appraisal ratings and perceptual scores on each music test.
RESULTS: Music is rated as more enjoyable by CI users than by the NH listeners hearing music through a simulation (CIsim), and the difference is statistically significant. For roughly half of the music perception tests, there are no statistically significant differences between the performance of the CI users and of the CIsim listeners. Generally, correlations between appraisal ratings and music perception scores are weak or nonexistent.
CONCLUSIONS: NH adults listening to music that has been processed through a CI-simulation program are a reasonable model for actual CI users for many music perception skills, but not for rating musical enjoyment. For CI users, the apparent independence of music perception skills and music enjoyment (as assessed by appraisals) indicates that music enjoyment should not be assumed and should be examined explicitly. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22533978      PMCID: PMC3400338          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.23.5.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  32 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.

Authors:  Charles J Limb
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Erika Skoe; Nicole M Russo; Tasha Dees; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.

Authors:  Matthias Milczynski; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  [Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants].

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Alejandro Castro; Marta Bastarrica; Rosa Pérez-Mora; Belén Herrán; Lorena Sanz; M Josefa de Sarriá; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2008-05

5.  Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; C R Lansing
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

6.  Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Robert S Kang; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  S Pijl; D W Schwarz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Varieties of musical disorders. The Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz; Annie Sophie Champod; Krista Hyde
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  16 in total

1.  Beyond Technology: The Interaction of Perceptual Accuracy and Experiential Factors in Pediatric Music Engagement.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Adam Schwalje
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.

Authors:  Kristin M Sjoberg; Virginia D Driscoll; Kate Gfeller; Anne E Welhaven; Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-01-18

3.  Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Naomi B H Croghan; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Reduction of the Harmonic Series Influences Musical Enjoyment With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  John S Nemer; Gavriel D Kohlberg; Dean M Mancuso; Brianna M Griffin; Michael V Certo; Stephanie Y Chen; Michael B Chun; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception.

Authors:  Yuexin Cai; Fei Zhao; Yuebo Chen; Maojin Liang; Ling Chen; Haidi Yang; Hao Xiong; Xueyuan Zhang; Yiqing Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jacob J Oleson; Kate Gfeller; Jillian Crosson; Virginia D Driscoll; Jong Ho Won; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Translation and validation of the music-related quality of life questionnaire for adults with cochlear implant in Turkish language.

Authors:  Ahmet Alperen Akbulut; Ayça Çiprut; Esra Akdeniz; Çağlar Batman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hwa; Christopher Z Wen; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

9.  Brain responses to musical feature changes in adolescent cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Bjørn Petersen; Ethan Weed; Pascale Sandmann; Elvira Brattico; Mads Hansen; Stine Derdau Sørensen; Peter Vuust
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Agathe Pralus; Ruben Hermann; Fanny Cholvy; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Annie Moulin; Pascal Barone; Nicolas Grimault; Eric Truy; Barbara Tillmann; Anne Caclin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.