Literature DB >> 18295992

Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Qian-Jie Fu1, John J Galvin.   

Abstract

Advances in implant technology and speech processing have provided great benefit to many cochlear implant patients. However, some patients receive little benefit from the latest technology, even after many years' experience with the device. Moreover, even the best cochlear implant performers have great difficulty understanding speech in background noise, and music perception and appreciation remain major challenges. Recent studies have shown that targeted auditory training can significantly improve cochlear implant patients' speech recognition performance. Such benefits are not only observed in poorly performing patients, but also in good performers under difficult listening conditions (e.g., speech noise, telephone speech, music, etc.). Targeted auditory training has also been shown to enhance performance gains provided by new implant devices and/or speech processing strategies. These studies suggest that cochlear implantation alone may not fully meet the needs of many patients, and that additional auditory rehabilitation may be needed to maximize the benefits of the implant device. Continuing research will aid in the development of efficient and effective training protocols and materials, thereby minimizing the costs (in terms of time, effort and resources) associated with auditory rehabilitation while maximizing the benefits of cochlear implantation for all recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18295992      PMCID: PMC2603139          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  69 in total

1.  Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  I Hochberg; A Boothroyd; M Weiss; S Hellman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-28

3.  Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus).

Authors:  J Kiefer; J Müller; T Pfennigdorff; F Schön; J Helms; C von Ilberg; W Baumgartner; W Gstöttner; K Ehrenberger; W Arnold; K Stephan; W Thumfart; S Baur
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  M W Skinner; G M Clark; L A Whitford; P M Seligman; S J Staller; D B Shipp; J K Shallop; C Everingham; C M Menapace; P L Arndt
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-11

5.  Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech.

Authors:  P Tallal; S L Miller; G Bedi; G Byma; X Wang; S S Nagarajan; C Schreiner; W M Jenkins; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effects of noise on speech discrimination in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  J Müller-Deile; B J Schmidt; H Rudert
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

7.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  M Nilsson; S D Soli; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Auditory temporal resolution and open speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  C Muchnik; R Taitelbaum; S Tene; M Hildesheimer
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1994

10.  Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training.

Authors:  M M Merzenich; W M Jenkins; P Johnston; C Schreiner; S L Miller; P Tallal
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  45 in total

1.  Preservation of rhythmic clocking in cochlear implant users: a study of isochronous versus anisochronous beat detection.

Authors:  Irene Kim; Eunice Yang; Patrick J Donnelly; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

Review 2.  Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jacqueline Leybaert; Carol J LaSasso
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Behavioral training enhances cortical temporal processing in neonatally deafened juvenile cats.

Authors:  Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marcia W Raggio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Benefits of music training in mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin; Xiaosong Wang; Jiunn-Liang Wu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Vocoded speech perception with simulated shallow insertion depths in adults and children.

Authors:  Arifi Waked; Sara Dougherty; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Localization in reverberation with cochlear implants: predicting performance from basic psychophysical measures.

Authors:  Stefan Kerber; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-26

Review 9.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

Review 10.  Development and plasticity of intra- and intersensory information processing.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Andrea R Hillock; Christopher Spankovich; Maria V Popescu; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.