Literature DB >> 23440517

Localization in reverberation with cochlear implants: predicting performance from basic psychophysical measures.

Stefan Kerber1, Bernhard U Seeber.   

Abstract

Users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) experience difficulties localizing sounds in reverberant rooms, even in rooms where normal-hearing listeners would hardly notice the reverberation. We measured the localization ability of seven bilateral CI users listening with their own devices in anechoic space and in a simulated reverberant room. To determine factors affecting performance in reverberant space we measured the sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and forward masking in the same participants using direct computer control of the electric stimulation in their CIs. Localization performance, quantified by the coefficient of determination r(2) and the root mean squared error, was significantly worse in the reverberant room than in anechoic conditions. Localization performance in the anechoic room, expressed as r(2), was best predicted by subject's sensitivity to ILDs. However, the decrease in localization performance caused by reverberation was better predicted by the sensitivity to envelope ITDs measured on single electrode pairs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.92. The CI users who were highly sensitive to envelope ITDs also better maintained their localization ability in reverberant space. Results in the forward masking task added only marginally to the predictions of localization performance in both environments. The results indicate that envelope ITDs provided by CI processors support localization in reverberant space. Thus, methods that improve perceptual access to envelope ITDs could help improve localization with bilateral CIs in everyday listening situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23440517      PMCID: PMC3642272          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0378-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  35 in total

1.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Donald K Eddington; H Steven Colburn; William M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Localization of sound in rooms, III: Onset and duration effects.

Authors:  B Rakerd; W M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency.

Authors:  W A Yost; R H Dye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Stimulus-onset dominance in the perception of binaural information.

Authors:  T Houtgast; S Aoki
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bernhard U Seeber; Uwe Baumann; Hugo Fastl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Precedence based speech segregation in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Vahid Montazeri; Peter F Assmann; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evidence for a neural source of the precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Tanvi Thakkar; G Christopher Stecker; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

4.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Louise H Loiselle; Michael F Dorman; William A Yost; Sarah J Cook; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Impact of Synchronized Cochlear Implant Sampling and Stimulation on Free-Field Spatial Hearing Outcomes: Comparing the ciPDA Research Processor to Clinical Processors.

Authors:  Stephen R Dennison; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Comparison of the benefits of cochlear implantation versus contra-lateral routing of signal hearing aids in adult patients with single-sided deafness: study protocol for a prospective within-subject longitudinal trial.

Authors:  Pádraig T Kitterick; Gerard M O'Donoghue; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Andrew Marshall; Ellen Jeffs; Louise Craddock; Alison Riley; Kevin Green; Martin O'Driscoll; Dan Jiang; Terry Nunn; Shakeel Saeed; Wanda Aleksy; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2014-08-11

9.  Effects of Bilateral Automatic Gain Control Synchronization in Cochlear Implants With and Without Head Movements: Sound Source Localization in the Frontal Hemifield.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling; Chen Chen; William A Yost; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  A method to enhance the use of interaural time differences for cochlear implants in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.