Literature DB >> 28147603

Vocoded speech perception with simulated shallow insertion depths in adults and children.

Arifi Waked1, Sara Dougherty1, Matthew J Goupell1.   

Abstract

It is unclear how adults and children differ in their ability to learn distorted speech signals. Normal-hearing adults (≥18 years) and children (8-10 years) were repeatedly tested on vocoded speech perception with 0-, 3-, and 6-mm of frequency-to-place mismatch (i.e., shift). Between testing blocks, listeners were provided training blocks with feedback on the 6-mm shift condition. Adults performed better than children at 0-mm shift, but performed similarly at 3- and 6-mm shifts. Therefore, differences between adults and children in vocoded speech perception are dependent on the degree of distortion, and this difference seems unaltered by training with feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28147603      PMCID: PMC5724741          DOI: 10.1121/1.4973649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; R V Shannon; A S Martinez; J Wygonski; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Karen Taylor; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

4.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Maja Svrakic; J Thomas Roland; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Children discover the spectral skeletons in their native language before the amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Robert R Packer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth.

Authors:  Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Deborah Stanton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Memory Span for Spoken Digits in Adults With Cochlear Implants or Typical Hearing: Effects of Age and Identification Ability.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; Tracy Wilkinson; Lauren Wilson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal.

Authors:  Isabel A Martin; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Ting Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Dichotic listening performance with cochlear-implant simulations of ear asymmetry is consistent with difficulty ignoring clearer speech.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Daniel Eisenberg; Kristina DeRoy Milvae
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Garrison T Draves; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The recognition of time-compressed speech as a function of age in listeners with cochlear implants or normal hearing.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Lauren Montero; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.702

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.