Literature DB >> 21109551

Preservation of rhythmic clocking in cochlear implant users: a study of isochronous versus anisochronous beat detection.

Irene Kim1, Eunice Yang, Patrick J Donnelly, Charles J Limb.   

Abstract

The capacity for internal rhythmic clocking involves a relationship between perceived auditory input and subsequent cognitive processing by which isochronous auditory stimuli induce a temporal beat expectancy in a listener. Although rhythm perception has previously been examined in cochlear implant (CI) users through various tasks based primarily on rhythm pattern identification, such tasks may not have been sufficiently nuanced to detect defects in internal rhythmic clocking, which requires temporal integration on a scale of milliseconds. The present study investigated the preservation of such rhythmic clocking in CI participants through a task requiring detection of isochronicity in the final beat of a four-beat series presented at different tempos. Our results show that CI users performed comparably to normal hearing (NH) participants in all isochronous rhythm detection tasks but that professionally trained musicians (MUS) significantly outperformed both NH and CI participants. These results suggest that CI users have intact rhythm perception even on a temporally demanding task that requires tight preservation of timing differences between a series of auditory events. Also, these results suggest that musical training might improve rhythmic clocking in CI users beyond normal hearing levels, which may be useful in light of the deficits in spectral processing commonly observed in CI users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21109551      PMCID: PMC4111468          DOI: 10.1177/1084713810387937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  23 in total

1.  Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  K Gfeller; A Christ; J F Knutson; S Witt; K T Murray; R S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Mariana C Leal; Young Je Shin; Marie-Laurence Laborde; Marie-Noëlle Calmels; Sebastien Verges; Stéphanie Lugardon; Sandrine Andrieu; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 3.  Rhythm in language and music: parallels and differences.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Rachel Cruz; J Ackland Jones; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal pattern discrimination and speech recognition under electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L M Collins; G H Wakefield; G R Feinman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

9.  Deficits of non-verbal auditory perception in postlingually deaf humans using cochlear implants.

Authors:  E Szelag; I Kolodziejczyk; M Kanabus; J Szuchnik; A Senderski
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.