Literature DB >> 20724357

Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants.

Jacqueline Leybaert1, Carol J LaSasso.   

Abstract

Nearly 300 million people worldwide have moderate to profound hearing loss. Hearing impairment, if not adequately managed, has strong socioeconomic and affective impact on individuals. Cochlear implants have become the most effective vehicle for helping profoundly deaf children and adults to understand spoken language, to be sensitive to environmental sounds, and, to some extent, to listen to music. The auditory information delivered by the cochlear implant remains non-optimal for speech perception because it delivers a spectrally degraded signal and lacks some of the fine temporal acoustic structure. In this article, we discuss research revealing the multimodal nature of speech perception in normally-hearing individuals, with important inter-subject variability in the weighting of auditory or visual information. We also discuss how audio-visual training, via Cued Speech, can improve speech perception in cochlear implantees, particularly in noisy contexts. Cued Speech is a system that makes use of visual information from speechreading combined with hand shapes positioned in different places around the face in order to deliver completely unambiguous information about the syllables and the phonemes of spoken language. We support our view that exposure to Cued Speech before or after the implantation could be important in the aural rehabilitation process of cochlear implantees. We describe five lines of research that are converging to support the view that Cued Speech can enhance speech perception in individuals with cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20724357      PMCID: PMC4111351          DOI: 10.1177/1084713810375567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  60 in total

1.  Development of speechreading supplements based on automatic speech recognition.

Authors:  P Duchnowski; D S Lum; J C Krause; M G Sexton; M S Bratakos; L D Braida
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Cued speech in the stimulation of communication: an advantage in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  C Descourtieux; V Groh; A Rusterholtz; I Simoulin; D Busquet
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis.

Authors:  Rachel I Mayberry; Elizabeth Lock
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  What can be expected from a late cochlear implantation?

Authors:  Maria-Izabel Kos; Marielle Deriaz; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Automatic speech recognition to aid the hearing impaired: prospects for the automatic generation of cued speech.

Authors:  R M Uchanski; L A Delhorne; A K Dix; L D Braida; C M Reed; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1994

8.  Lip reading in infants: attention to speech presented in- and out-of-synchrony.

Authors:  B Dodd
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The bimodal perception of speech in infancy.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; A N Meltzoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain.

Authors:  David R Moore; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

1.  Visual Reliance During Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users and Candidates.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara J Vasil; Christin Ray
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Simultaneous Communication and Cochlear Implants in the Classroom?

Authors:  Helen C Blom; Marc Marschark
Journal:  Deafness Educ Int       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  How does visual language affect crossmodal plasticity and cochlear implant success?

Authors:  C R Lyness; B Woll; R Campbell; V Cardin
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Cochlear implantation (CI) for prelingual deafness: the relevance of studies of brain organization and the role of first language acquisition in considering outcome success.

Authors:  Ruth Campbell; Mairéad MacSweeney; Bencie Woll
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.