Literature DB >> 8572106

Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.

M W Skinner1, G M Clark, L A Whitford, P M Seligman, S J Staller, D B Shipp, J K Shallop, C Everingham, C M Menapace, P L Arndt.   

Abstract

Sixty-three postlinguistically deaf adults from four English-speaking countries participated in a 17-week field study of performance with a new speech coding strategy, Spectral Peak (SPEAK), and the most widely used strategy, Multipeak (MPEAK), both of which are implemented on wearable speech processors of the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System; MPEAK is a feature-extraction strategy, whereas SPEAK is a filterbank strategy. Subjects' performance was evaluated with an experimental design in which use of each strategy was reversed and replicated (ABAB). Average scores for speech tests presented sound-only at 70 dB SPL were higher with the SPEAK strategy than with the MPEAK strategy. For tests in quiet, mean scores for medial vowels were 74.8 percent versus 70.1 percent; for medial consonants, 68.6 percent versus 56.6 percent; for monosyllabic words, 33.8 percent versus 24.6 percent; and for sentences, 77.5 percent versus 67.4 percent. For tests in noise, mean scores for Four-Choice Spondees at +10 and +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) were 88.5 percent versus 73.6 percent and 80.1 percent versus 62.3 percent, respectively; and for sentences at +15 dB, +10, and +5 dB S/N, 66.5 percent versus 43.4 percent, 61.5 percent versus 37.1 percent, and 60.4 percent versus 31.7 percent, respectively. Subjects showed marked improvement in recognition of sentences in noise with the new SPEAK filterbank strategy. These results agree closely with subjects' responses to a questionnaire on which approximately 80 percent reported they heard best with the SPEAK strategy for everyday listening situations.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8572106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  51 in total

1.  Modeling spoken word recognition performance by pediatric cochlear implant users using feature identification.

Authors:  S A Frisch; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Modeling phoneme and open-set word recognition by cochlear implant users: a preliminary report.

Authors:  T A Meyer; S Frisch; M A Svirsky; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

3.  Using behavioral data to model open-set word recognition and lexical organization by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  S Frisch; T A Meyer; D B Pisoni; M A Svirsky; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

4.  Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift.

Authors:  J D Harnsberger; M A Svirsky; A R Kaiser; D B Pisoni; R Wright; T A Meyer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M A Svirsky; A M Robbins; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

Review 7.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

9.  Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The High Rate CIS Auditory Brainstem Implant for Restoration of Hearing in NF-2 Patients.

Authors:  Robert Behr; Joachim Müller; Wafaa Shehata-Dieler; Hans-Peter Schlake; Jan Helms; Klaus Roosen; Norfrid Klug; Bernd Hölper; Artur Lorens
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.