Literature DB >> 8085109

Auditory temporal resolution and open speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients.

C Muchnik1, R Taitelbaum, S Tene, M Hildesheimer.   

Abstract

The recognition of speech events depends, among other factors, on the resolution function. The present study was conducted to evaluate the auditory temporal resolution function in cochlear implant (CI) subjects by a gap detection threshold (GDT) test. Fourteen postlingual deaf subjects who used the Nucleus 22 Channel CI system participated in the study. They were divided into two subgroups: (1) six patients who did not achieve a significant open speech recognition score; and (2) eight patients who obtained different levels of open speech recognition ability (OSRA). Gap detection thresholds were found for six noise burst durations: 85, 65, 52, 36, 25 and 10 msec. Absolute values of GDT in the CI group were longer compared with those obtained from normal-hearing subjects. The CI values varied in consistence with burst duration; namely, as burst duration decreased, GD increased. This trend was found in CI recipients with OSRA only. Examination of the relationship between GDT and OSRA indicated that the majority of CI recipients who had OSRA showed lower GDT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8085109     DOI: 10.3109/01050399409047493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  14 in total

1.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

2.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

4.  The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Adam R Kaiser; Ted A Meyer; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Lorraine A Delhorne; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Brian Gygi; Kim Thien N Ho
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-12

7.  Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Brian Gygi; Min-Yu Cheng; Jay Vachhani; Megan Mulvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chelsea Blankenship; Fawen Zhang; Robert Keith
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Computer-Assisted Speech Training for Cochlear Implant Patients: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2007-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.