Literature DB >> 18256863

Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.

Lisa A Parr1, Matthew Heintz.   

Abstract

The face inversion effect, or impaired recognition of upside down compared to upright faces, is used as a marker for the configural processing of faces in primates. The inversion effect in humans and chimpanzees is strongest for categories of stimuli for which subjects have considerable expertise, primarily conspecifics' faces. Moreover, discrimination performance decreases linearly as faces are incrementally rotated from upright to inverted. This suggests that rotated faces must be transformed, or normalized back into their most typical viewpoint before configural processing can ensue, and the greater the required normalization, the greater the likelihood of errors resulting. Previous studies in our lab have demonstrated a general face inversion effect in rhesus monkeys that was not influenced by expertise. Therefore, the present study examined the influence of rotation angle on the visual perception of face and nonface stimuli that varied in their level of expertise to further delineate the processes underlying the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys. Five subjects discriminated images in five orientation angles. Results showed significant linear impairments for all stimulus categories, including houses. However, compared to the upright images, only rhesus faces resulted in worse performance at rotation angles greater than 45 degrees , suggesting stronger configural processing for stimuli for which subjects had the greatest expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18256863      PMCID: PMC2829979          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0137-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  24 in total

1.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Mental rotation of faces.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-11

4.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Face recognition by monkeys: absence of an inversion effect.

Authors:  C Bruce
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?

Authors:  Stephan M Collishaw; Graham J Hole
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Visual information processing in the lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus): mental rotation or rotational invariance?

Authors:  Britta Burmann; Guido Dehnhardt; Björn Mauck
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  The perception of unfamiliar faces and houses by chimpanzees: influence of rotation angle.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Inversion effect for faces in split-brain monkeys.

Authors:  B A Vermeire; C R Hamilton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans.

Authors:  V D Hollard; J D Delius
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  14 in total

1.  First- and second-order configural sensitivity for greeble stimuli in baboons.

Authors:  Carole Parron; Joël Fagot
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Primate auditory recognition memory performance varies with sound type.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Bethany Plakke; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity.

Authors:  Anthony P Atkinson; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 6.  The evolution of face processing in primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-07-23

8.  Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  The effects of age and sex on interest toward movies of conspecifics in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).

Authors:  Junko Tsuchida; Akihiro Izumi
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.