Literature DB >> 17286118

The perception of unfamiliar faces and houses by chimpanzees: influence of rotation angle.

Lisa A Parr1, Matthew Heintz.   

Abstract

The inversion effect, or impaired recognition of upside-down faces, is used as evidence supporting the configural processing of faces. Human studies report a linear relationship between face-discrimination performance and orientation, such that recognition is more difficult as faces are rotated away from their typical viewpoint. Previous studies on chimpanzees also support a configural bias for processing faces, particularly faces for which subjects have developed expertise. In the present study, we examined the influence of expertise and rotation angle on the visual perception of faces in chimpanzees. Six subjects were presented with unaltered and blurred conspecific faces and houses in five orientation angles. A computerized paradigm was used to further delineate the nature of configural face processing in this species. The data were consistent with those reported in humans: chimpanzees showed a significant linear impairment when discriminating conspecific faces as they rotated away from their upright orientation. No inversion effect was observed for discriminations involving houses. Thus, chimpanzees, like humans, show a face-specific inversion effect that is linearly affected by angle of orientation, suggesting that their visual processing of faces is strongly influenced by the extraction of configural cues and closely resembles the perceptual strategies of humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17286118     DOI: 10.1068/p5455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  17 in total

1.  Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Primate auditory recognition memory performance varies with sound type.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Bethany Plakke; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Facial expression recognition in rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 6.  The evolution of face processing in primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Unoma Akamagwuna
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Understanding chimpanzee facial expression: insights into the evolution of communication.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Bridget M Waller
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Facial expression categorization by chimpanzees using standardized stimuli.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Bridget M Waller; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-04

10.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.