Literature DB >> 20632050

Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Jessica Taubert1, Lisa A Parr.   

Abstract

All primates can recognize faces and do so by analyzing the subtle variation that exists between faces. Through a series of three experiments, we attempted to clarify the nature of second-order information processing in nonhuman primates. Experiment one showed that both chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) tolerate geometric distortions along the vertical axis, suggesting that information about absolute position of features does not contribute to accurate face recognition. Chimpanzees differed from monkeys, however, in that they were more sensitive to distortions along the horizontal axis, suggesting that when building a global representation of facial identity, horizontal relations between features are more diagnostic of identity than vertical relations. Two further experiments were performed to determine whether the monkeys were simply less sensitive to horizontal relations compared to chimpanzees or were instead relying on local features. The results of these experiments confirm that monkeys can utilize a holistic strategy when discriminating between faces regardless of familiarity. In contrast, our data show that chimpanzees, like humans, use a combination of holistic and local features when the faces are unfamiliar, but primarily holistic information when the faces become familiar. We argue that our comparative approach to the study of face recognition reveals the impact that individual experience and social organization has on visual cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632050      PMCID: PMC3014412          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-010-0341-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  39 in total

1.  Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation.

Authors:  Richard Le Grand; Catherine J Mondloch; Daphne Maurer; Henry P Brent
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-11

2.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

3.  Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-09-10

4.  Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  L A Parr; J T Winslow; W D Hopkins; F B de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.

Authors:  Graham J Hole; Patricia A George; Karen Eaves; Ayman Rasek
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.

Authors:  V Bruce; Z Henderson; C Newman; A M Burton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2001-09

7.  Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition.

Authors:  Katalin M Gothard; Kelly N Brooks; Mary A Peterson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Inversion effect for faces in split-brain monkeys.

Authors:  B A Vermeire; C R Hamilton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces.

Authors:  Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  The perception of two-tone Mooney faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.065

2.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 4.  The cortical microstructural basis of lateralized cognition: a review.

Authors:  Steven A Chance
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-30

5.  Sheep recognize familiar and unfamiliar human faces from two-dimensional images.

Authors:  Franziska Knolle; Rita P Goncalves; A Jennifer Morton
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Intranasal oxytocin selectively modulates the behavior of rhesus monkeys in an expression matching task.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Molly Flessert; Ning Liu; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.